Effectiveness Of Scapular Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique Along With Maitland Mobilization Versus Scapular Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation Technique Along With Kaltenborn Mobilization in Adhesive Capsulitis A Randomized Controlled Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 69
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- VAS, Range of motion and DASH Disability questionnaire
研究概览
简要总结
According to the literature review, A study compared two scapular techniques – scapular PNF and scapular mobilization combined with Maitland Glenohumeral mobilization, and found that Scapular PNF with Maitland had better results in improving symptoms.But there have been no comparative study on two different Glenohumeral mobilization techniques combined with scapular PNF. This study compares two different glenohumeral mobilization techniques – Maitland and Kaltenborn – with different work mechanisms, in combination with the Scapular PNF technique to address both scapulothoracic joint and glenohumeral joint. Therefore, this study aims to discover which combined technique is more clinically effective, to incorporate into the rehabilitation program of Adhesive Capsulitis.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Coin toss, Lottery, toss of dice, shuffling cards etc
- 盲法
- Participant Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 40.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Prediagnosed cases of adhesive capsulitis.
- •Inflammatory and freezing stages of adhesive capsulitis.
- •Unilateral adhesive capsulitis.
- •Adhesive capsulitis of primary and secondary origin.
- •Diabetic patients on medications.
- •Both males and females of the age group 40 to 60 years.
排除标准
- •History of shoulder surgery or manipulation under general anaesthesia to the affected shoulder within last 3months.
- •Any neurological deficit affecting the shoulder functioning during daily activities.
结局指标
主要结局
VAS, Range of motion and DASH Disability questionnaire
时间窗: At baseline, post 6 weeks
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Dr Sujata Nair
Maharashtra University of Health Sciences