Video Laryngoscopy Versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Nasotracheal Intubation
- Conditions
- Congenital Heart DiseaseAirway Complication of Anesthesia
- Interventions
- Device: laryngoscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT05902013
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of Vienna
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to perform a pilot study investigating the first attempt intubation success rate differing between video laryngoscope nasotracheal intubation and direct laryngoscope nasotracheal intubation.
The study population will consist of 60 neonates and infants with congenital heart disease less than 1 year of age who need nasotracheal intubation during general anesthesia for cardiac procedures.
Standard nasotracheal intubation will be performed using either a video laryngoscope or direct laryngoscopy. Neonates and infants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to standard video laryngoscopy (with one of the following systems: Storz C-MAC Miller Video Laryngoscope, Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany or Mc Grath Video Laryngoscope, Medtronic, Boulder,USA) or to direct laryngoscopy with one of the following blades: Miller or Macintosh (Heine, Hersching, Germany).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 180
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Video laryngoscopy using video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation Direct laryngoscopy using direct laryngoscopy
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method first attempt intubation success rate study period, 30 minutes number
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Medical University Vienna
🇦🇹Vienna, Austria