MedPath

Pharmacokinetics of Calcineurin & mTOR Inhibitors in HIV-1 Infected Kidney Transplant Recipients After Switch to BIC/FTC/TAF

Phase 4
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
HIV-infected Patient Kidney Transplant Recipient
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT04993872
Lead Sponsor
Institut de Médecine et d'Epidémiologie Appliquée - Fondation Internationale Léon M'Ba
Brief Summary

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a critical comorbidity for patients living with HIV (PLWH), with an estimated prevalence between 2.4 and 17%, leading to end-stage renal disease 3 to 6 fold more than non-HIV population. However kidney transplantation for PLWH has become the first-line therapy for end-stage renal disease, with an enhanced survival benefit compared to remaining on dialysis.

Management of antiretroviral therapy (ART) in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients (HIV-KTR) has historically been problematic because of the potential nephrotoxicity of some antiretroviral drugs and the interactions between calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors, and ritonavir or cobicistat-boosted containing-ART. The use of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a widely recommended nucleotide analogue for the treatment of both HIV and HIV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) co-infection, is restricted in vulnerable kidney population as HIV-KTR due to its major potential toxicity consistent with tubular dysfunction and rarely with a progressive sustained decline in renal function. The optimal long-term ART regimen is not known in HIV-KTR, though it makes intuitive sense to avoid regimens containing TDF, given its potential nephrotoxicity. Nevertheless the potent virological efficacy of TDF both on HIV and HBV and its highest in-vitro barrier to resistance among the Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors makes tenofovir use highly recommended or even essential in HIV/HBV co-infections.

Tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) and bictegravir (BIC) are 2 novel antiretroviral drug available in HIV treatment in combination with emtricitabine (F) (B/F/TAF):

\* TAF is a novel prodrug of tenofovir that may offer improved renal safety over TDF. TAF is more stable in plasma and is metabolized intracellularly by cathepsin A, an enzyme that is highly expressed in lymphoid tissues. Therefore, TAF can achieve higher intracellular levels of the active moiety tenofovir diphosphate, with lower levels of circulating tenofovir when compared with TDF. This more targeted treatment could potentially result in fewer renal and bone complications despite the same clinical efficacy as TDF. TAF was approved for use in PLWH with mild-moderate CKD (eGFR: 30-69 mL/min).

The availability of TAF seems a potential addition to the antiretroviral armamentarium in HIV-KTR. \* BIC is a novel second-generation integrase strand transfer inhibitor (INSTI) has a high in-vitro barrier to resistance and in-vitro activity against most INSTI-resistant variants and has low potential for clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions. BIC has been recently approved by the FDA, in coformulated B/F/TAF for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in antiretroviral naïve subjects and in those with suppressed viremia.

No data are available yet with TAF use in HIV-infected kidney transplant recipients as well as with BIC, especially about potential drug-to-drug interactions with immunosuppressive drugs such as calcineurin \& mTOR inhibitors.

At last simplification to a single tablet regimen (STR) may offer a once-daily option for HIV-KTR who have multiple comorbidities, often requires complex regimens with a high pill burden.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
5
Inclusion Criteria
  • HIV-1 infected patients > 18 years
  • Kidney transplant recipient ≥ 3 months
  • Receiving calcineurin and/or mTOR inhibitors without change in doses ≥ 4 weeks
  • Plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cpml ≥ 6 months (1 blip permitted <200cp/ml)
  • eGFR (CKD-EPI) ≥ 30 ml/mn/1.73m2
  • Written consent
  • GSS to BIC/FTC/TAF GSS ≥ 2
  • stable antiretroviral regimen for at least 3 months
  • Active contraception in potential child-bearing women
Exclusion Criteria
  • Allergy or intolerance to one of the following drug or to any of excipients: FTC, TDF, INSTI
  • HIV-2 or HIV-1/HIV-2 co-infection
  • Patients with severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh Class C)
  • Patient without health coverage
  • Pregnancy and breast-feeding

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
BIC/FTC/TAFBiktarvy TabDevelopment phase 4: Biktarvy®
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' blood concentrations after switch to B/F/TAFWeek 2

Evolution of blood concentration

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
• Changes in plasma levels of calcineurin & mTOR inhibitorsWeek 48

Plasma levels concentrations

• Change in mGFR (iohexol clearance)Week 48

evolution of mGFR

• graft SurvivalBaseline to Week 48

defined as the necessity to return to dialysis, or death

• Incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events upbaseline to Week48

adverse event≥3 reported

• Incidence of specific calcineurin inhibitorsBaseline to Week 48

histological renal damage performed (if graft biopsy )

• Calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' drug dose changesBaseline to Week 48

Calcineurin \& mTOR inhibitors' drug dose changes

• Change CD4 cell count, ratio CD4/CD8Week 48

Immunology evolution

• Change in GSS* after switch to B/F/TAF Genotypic Susceptibility Score (GSS) to B/F/TAFbaseline to Week 48

GSS ≥ 2

• Adherence, HIV Treatment SatisfactionWeek48

adherence and satisfactory questionnaire

•Proportion in calcineurin & mTOR inhibitors' dose changes after switch to B/F/TAFWeek 2

PK of calcineurin and mTOR

• B/F/TAF plasma levelsWeek 4

B/F/TAF PK

• Change in bone markersWeek 48

bone markers and bone mineral density evolution

• Change in bone mineral densityWeek 48

bone markers and bone mineral density evolution

• Incidence of proximal tubulopathyBaseline

(hypouricemia, hypophosphatemia, low molecular weight proteinuria, orthoglycemic glycosuria) analysis

• Change in eGFR evaluated with plasma or serum Cystatin CWeek 48

evolution of eGFR

• Change in plasma metabolomeBaseline to Week 48

(Indoxyl sulfate, indole-3-acetic acid, Hippuric acid, para-cresol sulfate, 3-carboxy-4-methyl-5-propyl-2-furanpropanoic acid (CMPF) analysis

• Antiretroviral therapy changes during the follow-up throughBaseline to Week 48

Antiretroviral therapy changes

• Proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cp/mLWeek 48

Proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNA ≤ 50 cp/mL

• proportion of participants with virological failureBaseline to Week 48

defined as two consecutive HIV RNA VL\>50 copies/mL or a HIV RNA \>50 copies/mL followed by a study treatment discontinuation"

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

Hopital Henri Mondor

🇫🇷

Créteil, France

Hopital Hotel Dieu

🇫🇷

Nantes, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath