NCT02659176已完成不适用
Comparative Study Between Trans-perineal Repair With or Without Limited Internal Sphincterotomy in Treatment of Type I Anterior Rectocele: A Randomized Controlled Trial
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Incidence of recurrence
研究概览
简要总结
Comparison between transperineal repair of rectocele with or without posterior internal sphincterotomy.
详细描述
Transperineal repair of anterior rectocele is performed in two groups of patients, the first will undergo limited posterior internal sphincterotomy, the second group will not have internal sphincteroromy. The two groups are compared regarding recurrence of rectocele and improvement of symptoms.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patients with anterior rectocele
排除标准
- •Pregnant females
- •Rectocele with pelvic organ prolapse
- •Any patient with previous anorectal surgery
- •Pudendal nerve neuropathy
- •Anal fistula and sepsis
- •Patients with sphincter defect proved by endo-anal sonography
- •Patients proved to have colonic inertia either by colon transit time and/or history
- •Patients with defecography anomalies causing obstructed defecation other than rectocele (e.g. Anismus).
- •Also patients with vascular diseases, scleroderma, malnutrition, and coagulopathy were excluded.
结局指标
主要结局
Incidence of recurrence
时间窗: 18 months
Number of patients presenting with recurrent or persistent symptoms during follow up
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Sameh Emile
Lecturer of surgery
Mansoura University
研究点 (1)
Loading locations...
相似试验
已完成
不适用
Transvaginal Versus Transperineal Repair of RectoceleRectoceleNCT03801291Mansoura University64
已完成
3 期
LEVEL Trial: Correction of Inguinal Hernia, Endoscopic Versus LichtensteinInguinal HerniaNCT00788554Erasmus Medical Center660
已完成
不适用
Retroperitoneal Tunneling Versus Dissection Technique During SacrocolpopexyPelvic Organ ProlapseNCT05969067The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston40
Unknown
不适用
Rerouting Seton Versus LIFT for Complex Anal FistulaAnal FistulaNCT04616911Mansoura University77
已完成
不适用
Comparison of two bile duct cannulation methods in difficult ERCP casesObstruction of bile duct.Obstruction of bile ductK83.1IRCT20220905055884N1Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences128