Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05913128
NCT05913128CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison Between Glandular Urethral Disassembly Technique Versus Tubularized Incised Plate Technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Benha University1 site in 1 country86 target enrollmentStarted: July 30, 2023Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
86
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Hospital stay

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To compare Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique versus Tubularized Incised Plate technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Detailed Description

Aim of study to compare glandular Urethral Disassembly technique versus Tubularized Incised Plate technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Investigator)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
6 Months to 6 Years (Child)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Primary Distal Hypospadius

Exclusion Criteria

  • •secondary Distal Hypospadius Recurrent Hypospadius

Arms & Interventions

First arm

Active Comparator

Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique

Intervention: Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique (Procedure)

Second arm

Active Comparator

Tubularized Incised Plate technique

Intervention: Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Hospital stay

Time Frame: up to14 days

Hospital stay will be recorded in days.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ahmed Abou Elezz Abdel Fattah

Lecturer of urology

Benha University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials