Comparison Between Glandular Urethral Disassembly Technique Versus Tubularized Incised Plate Technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Benha University
- Enrollment
- 86
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Hospital stay
Study Overview
Brief Summary
To compare Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique versus Tubularized Incised Plate technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair
Detailed Description
Aim of study to compare glandular Urethral Disassembly technique versus Tubularized Incised Plate technique for Primary Distal Hypospadius Repair
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Investigator)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 6 Months to 6 Years (Child)
- Sex
- Male
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Inclusion Criteria
- •Primary Distal Hypospadius
Exclusion Criteria
- •secondary Distal Hypospadius Recurrent Hypospadius
Arms & Interventions
First arm
Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique
Intervention: Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique (Procedure)
Second arm
Tubularized Incised Plate technique
Intervention: Glandular Urethral Disassembly technique (Procedure)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Hospital stay
Time Frame: up to14 days
Hospital stay will be recorded in days.
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
Investigators
Ahmed Abou Elezz Abdel Fattah
Lecturer of urology
Benha University
