Effect of the Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) of the Motor Cortex on Chronic Abdominal Pain in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Abdominal Pain
- Sponsor
- Assiut University
- Enrollment
- 40
- Primary Endpoint
- verbal descriptor scale (VDS)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
To evaluate the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied to the motor cortex to reduce chronic abdominal visceral pain in a group of participants with hepatocellular carcinoma
Detailed Description
This study will be carried out in Assiut University Hospital pain clinic and in participation of department of neuropsychiatry in Assiut University Hospital. After obtaining approval of hospital ethical committee, informed written consent will be taken from all patients with malignant visceral pain to be involved in this study. In these study investigators test the hypothesis that Does transcranial direct current stimulation induce analgesia in chronic abdominal visceral pain due to liver cancer ? Preparation: The patient will seat in a comfortable chair and will be asked to relax as much as possible. tDCS was delivered using a battery driven DC stimulator (neuroConn Gmbh,98693 llmenau, Germany). Current was delivered by electrodes encased in sponge pads soaked with 1% saline solution. The machine was kept behind the participant and out of their view at all times. For both the active and sham conditions, the anode was placed over the motor cortex of the patient and the cathode was placed over the contralateral supraorbital region. Electrodes were secured using soft elastic straps. In the active stimulation condition a constant current of 2mA intensity was applied for 30 minutes with a 5-second ramp phase at the beginning. In the sham stimulation condition the machine was activated for 30 seconds using identical parameters but was then switched off without the patient's knowledge. This sham control is commonly employed because over the initial 30 seconds of stimulation, an initial sensation of tingling under the electrode fades away. Patients are less likely to distinguish active from sham conditions if the initial period of tingling is present in both. Patients were evaluated by verbal descriptor scale (VDS), visual analog scale (VAS), and Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D) at the baseline, after 1st, 5th, 10th session, and 1 month after end of sessions.
Investigators
Khaled Mohamed Abdelhameed
Resident at Anaesthesia, ICU and pain management department,Assiut University
Assiut University
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •All patients of above 18 years old, with malignant visceral pain due to primary liver cancer or on top of cirrhosis, resistant to medical treatment for at least 2 months or associated with significant adverse effect from medication will be involved in this study
Exclusion Criteria
- •Investigators will exclude patients with intracranial metallic devices or with pacemakers or any other device. Investigators also exclude those with extensive myocardial ischemia and those known to have epilepsy.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
verbal descriptor scale (VDS)
Time Frame: one month
measurement of reduction of chronic abdominal pain in cancer liver patients.
visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: one month
measurement of reduction of chronic abdominal pain in cancer liver patients.
Secondary Outcomes
- Hamilton rating scale for depression (HAM-D)(one month)