MedPath

Evaluation of Educational Intervention to Teach Principles of Evidence-based Medicine (EbM) in Biology Classes

Not Applicable
Conditions
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Interventions
Behavioral: Experimental educational intervention
Behavioral: Standard educational intervention
Registration Number
NCT01567267
Lead Sponsor
Goethe University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to identify the effect of a short term educational intervention for upcoming biology teachers to teach principles of Evidence-based Medicine (EbM) and Good Scientific Practice (GSP) to high-school biology students.

Detailed Description

Shared decision making is increasingly demanded by patients in order to take part in health care decisions. However this demand for autonomy can only be used for shared decision making if the patient has basic skills in critical health literacy. To transfer health care literacy to young and healthy consumers educational intervention programs at high-school might be a feasible and effective way. This preliminary phase 2 study is designed to investigate the effect of an educational intervention to be integrated in a curriculum for upcoming teachers in biology.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
87
Inclusion Criteria
  • students becoming biology teachers at participating university during enrollment period
Exclusion Criteria
  • refusal to participate in study

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Experimental educational interventionExperimental educational interventionExperimental educational intervention
Standard educational interventionStandard educational interventionStandard educational intervention
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in knowledge about EbM/GSPBefore (day1), during (day 2) and after (day 4) intervention

Difference in knowledge about EbM/GSP measured by alternating standardized, pre-validated, single-best/short-answer questionnaires consisting of 20 questions each

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Difference in skills about critically appraising scientific literatureBefore (day 1), during (day 2) and after (day 4) intervention

Difference in skills about critically appraising scientific literature measured by alternating randomized-controlled trials evaluated by a standardized checklist related to items of the CONSORT statement.

Skills in teaching principles of EbM and GSP to high school students in intervention groupAfter educational intervention (day 5)

Skill in teaching principles of EbM and GSP are evaluated for preparation of lessons using a standardized preparation form and performance of lessons evaluated by transcription of video tapes from each participant in the intervention group using a consented evaluation catalogue

Overall acceptance of educational intervention study participantsDuring (day 2) and after intervention (day 4)

Overall acceptance of educational intervention is evaluated by standardized questionnaires at day 2 and day 4 in the educational intervention group.

Overall acceptance of study lessons for biology high-school studentsAfter study lessons (day 5)

Overall acceptance of study lessons for biology high-school students is evaluated by a standardized questionnaire at day 5.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Siegen, Section of biology and und their didactics

🇩🇪

Siegen, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath