Comparison of chewing efficiency and patient satisfaction between complete denture prosthesis and mini implant supported over denture prosthesis
Not Applicable
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2021/02/031175
- Lead Sponsor
- Faculty of Dental Sciences M S Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Completely edentulous upper and lower arches , Adequate bone width and height to place an implant of at least 2.4mm diameter and 10mm in length
Exclusion Criteria
Patients with poor neuromuscular function, All patients who are contraindicated for undergoing surface EMG.( cardiac pacemakers , epilepsy), Undergone radiotherapy, Immune compromised ( on immune-steroid therapy), Need for any soft tissue or hard tissue augmentation, Bruxism, Any health conditions contraindicating implant placement (osteoporosis etc.)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method chewing efficiencyTimepoint: 4 weeks after insertion of conventional complete denture and then that of mini implant overdenture
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method patient satisfactionTimepoint: 4 weeks after insertion of prosthesis