Comparision of Direct Laryngoscopy and Video Laryngoscopy to Learn Successful Tracheal Intubation by Novices in Anaesthesiology
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Learning Problem
- Sponsor
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
- Enrollment
- 10
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- First pass success rate
- Status
- Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Comparision of direct laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy to learn successful tracheal intubation by novices in anaesthesiology
Detailed Description
Video laryngoscopy has been recommended as an alternative during difficult conventional direct laryngoscopy using the Macintosh blade. However, successful visualisation of the larynx and tracheal intubation using some of the indirect laryngoscopes or video laryngoscopy requires hand-eye coordination. To best of our knowledge in the current literature there are no data how is the best educative way to learn successful tracheal intubation by novices in anaesthesiology.
Investigators
Marc Kriege, MD
PD Dr. med.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age ≥ 18 Years
- •capacity to consent
- •Present written informed consent of the research participant
Exclusion Criteria
- •Age \<18 years
- •Lack of consent
- •inability to consent
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
First pass success rate
Time Frame: at intubation in 60 seconds
successful tracheal intubation at the first attempt, compared to more than one attempt
Secondary Outcomes
- Subjective Training Process(at one month)
- Overall success rate(at intubation in 120 seconds)
- Time to ventilation(at intubation in 120 seconds)
- Cormack and Lehane Classification(at intubation in 120 seconds)