Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02211313
NCT02211313TerminatedNot Applicable

Evaluation of Ureteral Stents in the Management of Stone Disease

Washington University School of Medicine2 sites in 1 country41 target enrollmentStarted: August 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Terminated
Enrollment
41
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Change From Baseline in Pain on the 10-point Analog Pain Scale at Day 7 Post Stent Removal.

Study Overview

Brief Summary

A thin tube, called a ureteral stent, is inserted into the ureter and is commonly used as treatment of urinary stone disease. Stents are designed to help provide drainage of the kidney in the setting of an obstructing stone, or postoperative swelling of the ureter. Though their presence is only temporary, stents are associated with a significant amount of patient discomfort and bother, which can negatively impact overall satisfaction. Over the past decades, there have been refinements in stent technology and usage philosophy. Smaller and softer stents are now available for use in patients, though studies evaluating the relative benefits have been conflicting. The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of stent size and composition upon outcomes after the treatment of stone disease, including patient comfort and satisfaction.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Over 18 years of age and willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Patients with current urinary stone disease, undergoing any of the following procedures:
  • cystoscopy with stent placement
  • ureteroscopy with intracorporeal lithotripsy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with compromised urinary tract due to cancer (e.g. bladder tumor, ureteral obstruction from non-GU malignancy)
  • Patients requiring bilateral surgical stone management procedure
  • Patients with any single stone exceeding 1.5 cm
  • Patients with severe concurrent disease, infection, or co-morbidity that, in the judgment of the investigator, would render the patient inappropriate for enrollment
  • Any patient who is on anticholinergic medication at baseline

Arms & Interventions

Ureteral stent - hydrophobic, 6 French

Active Comparator

Subjects randomized to hydrophobic stent, size 6 French

Intervention: Randomization to size 6 French soft vs. size 6 French hydrophobic ureteral stent. (Device)

Ureteral stent - soft, 6 French

Active Comparator

Subjects randomized to soft stent, size 6 French

Intervention: Randomization to size 6 French soft vs. size 6 French hydrophobic ureteral stent. (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Pain on the 10-point Analog Pain Scale at Day 7 Post Stent Removal.

Time Frame: Baseline, day 7 post stent removal

The 10-point scale ranges from 0 (zero) for no pain (minimum) to 10 for the worst possible pain (maximum). The unit of measure is 1 point on the 10-point scale.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials