Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04337086
NCT04337086CompletedNot Applicable

The Effect of T4K Versus Twin Block in Developing Class II Division I Malocculsion (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial)

Nourhan M.Aly1 site in 1 country20 target enrollmentStarted: January 23, 2008Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
20
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Overbite

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effect of myofunctional trainer T4K versus twin block functional appliance on the dentoalveolar changes in children with class II division I malocclusion

Detailed Description

This study was a parallel arm randomized comparative clinical trial including 20 healthy children age ranged from 9-12 years showing Angle's class II division I malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion. Preoperative photographs, radiographs and study casts were taken, children were randomly assigned into two groups according to the appliance used; Group 1: T4k, and Group II: twin block. Follow up was done every 4 weeks for 9 months. Postoperative cephalometric X ray, study casts and photographs were retaken for measurements and comparison.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

This study was a double-blind study, as the participant and the outcome assessors were blinded to the type of treatment.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
9 Years to 12 Years (Child)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Angle's class II division I malocclusion due to mandibular retrusion depending on clinical judgement and confirmed with the lateral cephalometric X-ray.
  • •Parental written consent was secured.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with mandibular shifts.
  • •Patients with severe crowding.
  • •Patients with anterior open bite.
  • •Patients with posterior crossbite.
  • •Patients with any peri-oral habits.
  • •Patients who had received any previous orthodontic or orthopaedic treatments.

Arms & Interventions

T4k

Experimental

Intervention: T4k Appliance (Device)

Twin block

Active Comparator

Intervention: Twin block appliance (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Overbite

Time Frame: 9 months

the extent of vertical (superior-inferior) overlap of the maxillary central incisors over the mandibular central incisors, measured relative to the incisal ridges. This was assessed on study casts

Dento-alveolar changes

Time Frame: 9 months

This was assessed using lateral cephalometric xrays. Inclination of of maxillary incisor was assessed by measuring the angle to Frankfurt horizontal plane

Overjet

Time Frame: 9 months

the extent of horizontal (anterior-posterior) overlap of the maxillary central incisors over the mandibular central incisors was measured on study casts.

Dento-alveolar changes

Time Frame: baseline

This was assessed using lateral cephalometric xrays. Inclination of of maxillary incisor was assessed by measuring the angle to Frankfurt horizontal plane

Overjet

Time Frame: baseline

the extent of horizontal (anterior-posterior) overlap of the maxillary central incisors over the mandibular central incisors was measured on study casts.

Overbite

Time Frame: baseline

the extent of vertical (superior-inferior) overlap of the maxillary central incisors over the mandibular central incisors, measured relative to the incisal ridges. This was assessed on study casts

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Nourhan M.Aly
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nourhan M.Aly

Dental Public Health clinical instructor and statistician

University of Alexandria

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials