MedPath

The Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination in Comparison With the Other Antiemetics

Registration Number
NCT06390787
Lead Sponsor
University of Baghdad
Brief Summary

This study investigates the effectiveness of combining vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to standard antiemetic treatments for managing nausea and vomiting. Through a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving adult patients with diverse causes of nausea and vomiting, we aim to evaluate the frequency, severity, and tolerability of the B6 and metoclopramide combination. By elucidating its comparative efficacy against established antiemetics, this research seeks to provide evidence-based guidance for clinicians in selecting optimal treatment regimens tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately enhancing the management of nausea and vomiting across various medical conditions.

Detailed Description

Title: Investigating the Efficacy of B6 and Metoclopramide Combination Versus Alternative Antiemetics: A Clinical Trial Proposal

Introduction:

Nausea and vomiting are common symptoms across various medical conditions and can significantly impact patients' quality of life and treatment outcomes. While several antiemetic medications exist, finding the most effective regimen remains a clinical challenge. This proposal aims to investigate the efficacy of a combination therapy comprising vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) and metoclopramide compared to other antiemetics in managing nausea and vomiting.

Rationale:

Both vitamin B6 and metoclopramide have shown antiemetic properties through different mechanisms of action. However, the comparative efficacy of this combination therapy against other standard antiemetics remains largely unexplored. Understanding the relative effectiveness of this combination could provide valuable insights into optimizing antiemetic strategies, particularly in patients with chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and other related conditions.

Objectives:

This prospective, randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy compared to alternative antiemetic regimens in reducing the frequency and severity of nausea and vomiting episodes in adult patients. Additionally, the study seeks to assess the safety profile and tolerability of the combination therapy.

Conclusion:

By elucidating the comparative efficacy of B6 and metoclopramide combination therapy, this study endeavors to contribute to evidence-based decision-making in the management of nausea and vomiting. The findings could potentially guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate antiemetic regimen tailored to individual patient needs, ultimately improving patient outcomes and quality of life.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
250
Inclusion Criteria
  • Any patients with vomiting
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients vitally unstable

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Metoclopramide GroupMetoclopramideThis group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Metoclopramide only for vomiting.
Zofran GroupOndansetronThis group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Zofran only for vomiting.
B6 and Metoclopramide GroupMetoclopramide and Vitamin B6This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given B6 and Metoclopramide combination for vomiting.
Vitamin B6 GroupVitamin B6This group of 50 patients with vomiting were given Vitamin B6 only for vomiting.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Nausea1 day

Four characteristics of nausea typically were measured including duration, frequency, severity, and associated distress. Duration was measured by asking the patient if they had experienced nausea and/or the number of hours that nausea was experienced during the time frame addressed.

Vomiting1 day

Four characteristics of vomiting typically were measured including duration, frequency, severity, and associated distress. Duration was measured by asking the patient if they had experienced vomiting and/or the number of hours that vomiing was experienced during the time frame addressed.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Al-Nassiryah Teaching Hospital

🇮🇶

Nasiriyah, Thi Qar, Iraq

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath