Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Pain School Intervention Targeting Patients With Chronic Non-cancer Pain as a Tool to Achieve Value in Healthcare.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 82
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- The topic of the pain school session was relevant for me?
研究概览
简要总结
BACKGROUND: Chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is a disabling condition with radical consequences. Magic fix-it solutions do not exist. CNCP is a condition for life, calling for healthcare services supporting its management. Value-based healthcare is a method to work with healthcare that, in the Capital Region of Denmark, serves as a framework for clinicians, administrators, and politicians to deliver healthcare services that create value for patients within available resources. An investigation conducted in collaboration between the Danish Health Association and Danish Regions, involving patients, medical experts, municipality representatives, and general practitioners found that the following preferences should be addressed to achieve value-based healthcare in multidisciplinary treatment of CNCP: Quality of life; acceptance; maintenance, and labor market; communication; social life; sleep; physical status and energy administration; pain management and -relief; emotional status and mood.
In response to the requirement to provide value in healthcare, the Multidisciplinary Pain Centre at Rigshospitalet designed a pain school intervention based on identified preferences. Previous studies have documented the benefits of educational programs in the multidisciplinary treatment of CNCP, but also ethnic/racial and socioeconomic disparities in treatment responses. The present study AIMED to evaluate patients' experience of participating in a pain school, designed to create value in healthcare in the multidisciplinary treatment of CNCP.
详细描述
DESIGN: The pain school intervention was evaluated using a questionnaire completed by the participants immediately after each of the seven pain school sessions. The questionnaire had two questions: 1: The topic of the pain school session was relevant for me. 2: The teachers communicated the topic of the pain school session appropriately. After the seventh and last pain school session, the participants were also asked to provide an overall evaluation of the pain school using a questionnaire with 9 questions across 4 categories.
The pain school was additionally evaluated using a qualitative design, with focus group interviews with pain school participants and individual interviews with patients who had three or more no-shows or cancellations.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Patient motivation
- •Ability to join a group and attend a classroom for 2 hours
- •Logistical feasibility
- •Sufficient energy
- •Exclusion cireteria
- •Inability to understand and speak Danish
- •Depression
- •Current resource-demanding opioid-tapering
- •Unstable attendance to appointments.
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
Pain school participants
干预措施: Pain school intervention (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
The topic of the pain school session was relevant for me?
时间窗: Day 1.
The Question had five response categories ranging from zero (not at all) to four (to a very great extent).
The teachers communicated the topic of the pain school session appropriately.
时间窗: Day 1.
The Question had five response categories ranging from zero (not at all) to four (to a very great extent).
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Pernille Friis Rønne
Assistant professor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark