MedPath

Cone Beam CT Versus Multislice CT in the Postoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implantation

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Cochlear Implants
Registration Number
NCT02892552
Lead Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Brief Summary

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic concordance between multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the early postoperative assessment of patients after cochlear implantation.

Study Design: Prospective, randomized, single-center, interventional, pilot study on the diagnostic performance of a medical device.

Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Patients aged over 18 years requiring a CT scan after cochlear implant surgery.

Interventions: Nine patients were implanted with electrode arrays from three different manufacturers, including one bilateral. High-resolution MSCT and CBCT were then performed, and 2 experienced radiologists blinded to the imaging modality evaluated the randomized images, twice.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
9
Inclusion Criteria
  • CI surgery for severe to profound bilateral deafness
  • affiliated with the French health insurance
Exclusion Criteria
  • pregnancy
  • Patients weighing more than 160 kg

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Concordance between MDCT and CBCT for assessing the scalar position of the electrodesAt inclusion

Blinded images were analyzed in random order by 2 radiologists with several years of experience in temporal bone imaging. Each radiologist analyzed on the workstation the images of each patient twice at 4- to 8-week intervals. A consensus reading was performed by a third experienced radiologist in case of discordance.

Each radiologist determined CI localization. The cochlear implant (CI) was considered within the scala tympani if it was in the most posterior scala on axial reconstructions passing through the cochlea (behind the osseous spiral lamina often seen).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
length of the intracochlear electrode arrayAt inclusion

Blinded images were analyzed in random order by 2 radiologists with several years of experience in temporal bone imaging. Each radiologist analyzed on the workstation the images of each patient twice at 4- to 8-week intervals. A consensus reading was performed by a third experienced radiologist in case of discordance.

This measurement was performed in the oblique coronal plane of the cochlea.

percentage of implanted cochleaAt inclusion

Blinded images were analyzed in random order by 2 radiologists with several years of experience in temporal bone imaging. Each radiologist analyzed on the workstation the images of each patient twice at 4- to 8-week intervals. A consensus reading was performed by a third experienced radiologist in case of discordance.

This measurement was performed in the oblique coronal plane of the cochlea.

number of intracochlear electrodesAt inclusion

Blinded images were analyzed in random order by 2 radiologists with several years of experience in temporal bone imaging. Each radiologist analyzed on the workstation the images of each patient twice at 4- to 8-week intervals. A consensus reading was performed by a third experienced radiologist in case of discordance.

This measurement was performed in the oblique coronal plane of the cochlea.

radiation doseAt inclusion

Radiation dose was estimated using Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI, in Gy.cm) for each patient and scanner. These data are collected directly from the data sheet for each examination (also anonymised).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Service imagerie pavillon B, Hopital E. Herriot

🇫🇷

Lyon, France

Service imagerie pavillon B, Hopital E. Herriot
🇫🇷Lyon, France
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath