Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02892552
NCT02892552
Completed
Not Applicable

Cone Beam CT Versus Multislice CT: Radiologic Diagnostic Agreement in the Postoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implantation

Hospices Civils de Lyon1 site in 1 country9 target enrollmentMarch 2013

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Cochlear Implants
Sponsor
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Enrollment
9
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Concordance between MDCT and CBCT for assessing the scalar position of the electrodes
Status
Completed
Last Updated
6 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic concordance between multislice computed tomography (MSCT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in the early postoperative assessment of patients after cochlear implantation.

Study Design: Prospective, randomized, single-center, interventional, pilot study on the diagnostic performance of a medical device.

Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Patients aged over 18 years requiring a CT scan after cochlear implant surgery.

Interventions: Nine patients were implanted with electrode arrays from three different manufacturers, including one bilateral. High-resolution MSCT and CBCT were then performed, and 2 experienced radiologists blinded to the imaging modality evaluated the randomized images, twice.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2013
End Date
June 2013
Last Updated
6 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Single Group
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • CI surgery for severe to profound bilateral deafness
  • affiliated with the French health insurance

Exclusion Criteria

  • pregnancy
  • Patients weighing more than 160 kg

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Concordance between MDCT and CBCT for assessing the scalar position of the electrodes

Time Frame: At inclusion

Blinded images were analyzed in random order by 2 radiologists with several years of experience in temporal bone imaging. Each radiologist analyzed on the workstation the images of each patient twice at 4- to 8-week intervals. A consensus reading was performed by a third experienced radiologist in case of discordance. Each radiologist determined CI localization. The cochlear implant (CI) was considered within the scala tympani if it was in the most posterior scala on axial reconstructions passing through the cochlea (behind the osseous spiral lamina often seen).

Secondary Outcomes

  • length of the intracochlear electrode array(At inclusion)
  • percentage of implanted cochlea(At inclusion)
  • number of intracochlear electrodes(At inclusion)
  • radiation dose(At inclusion)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials