MedPath

Hospital-Induced Immobility

Completed
Conditions
Geriatric
Immobilization
In-hospital Mobility
Interventions
Behavioral: A Mobilisation Initiative
Behavioral: Focus Group Interviews
Behavioral: Formal Education
Behavioral: Self-reported Level of Mobilisation
Behavioral: Observations of Patients and the Environment
Behavioral: Awareness of Mobilisation Survey
Registration Number
NCT05926908
Lead Sponsor
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Brief Summary

Inactivity and bedrest during hospitalisation have numerous negative consequences, and it is especially important that older patients are mobile during hospitalisation. In this study the investigators aimed to identify whether the introduction of formal education of clinical staff and a Mobilisation Initiative could increase mobilisation of patients in a geriatric and a medical ward. Furthermore, the investigators wanted to explore patients' and health care staffs' view on facilitators and barriers for mobilisation during hospitalisation

Detailed Description

Staying in bed and being inactive during hospitalisation can lead to a range of adverse consequences especially among older adults. The consequences include loss of muscle mass and strength leading to problems with loss of functional independence, risk of re-hospitalisation, and death. Moreover, older adults do not recover as well as younger adults with poor long-term recovery. The lack of in-hospital mobilisation is due to several factors including the hospital culture and organisational factors. Therefore, it is necessary to bring attention to this problem among the hospital staff. The aim of this study is to identify whether the introduction of formal education of clinical staff and a Mobilisation Initiative can increase the number of patients mobilised for breakfast and lunch among patients admitted to geriatric and medical wards. The activities planned in this study is self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation and observations of the patients, focus group interviews and survey on mobilisation awareness among the clinical staff, introduction of formal education and a Mobilisation Initiative. As hypothesized, this will result in an increased awareness of in-hospital mobilisation leading to an increase in the number of patients mobilised at mealtimes. Accordingly, expectations are that this will affect the activity level of the hospitalised patients and reduce adverse consequences leading to an increase in functional independence and reduce the number of readmissions resulting in a socioeconomic benefit.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
596
Inclusion Criteria
  • In-hospital patients in the geriatric and medical ward at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients declared moribund or delirious in the electronical medical journal
  • Patients isolated in the hospital room
  • Patients requiring interpreter for communication

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Geriatric wardSelf-reported Level of MobilisationInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Medical wardA Mobilisation InitiativeInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Geriatric wardFocus Group InterviewsInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Geriatric wardA Mobilisation InitiativeInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Geriatric wardFormal EducationInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Geriatric wardObservations of Patients and the EnvironmentInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Medical wardFormal EducationInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Medical wardObservations of Patients and the EnvironmentInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Geriatric wardAwareness of Mobilisation SurveyInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Medical wardAwareness of Mobilisation SurveyInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Medical wardFocus Group InterviewsInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Medical wardSelf-reported Level of MobilisationInterventions are: Patients' self-reported level of mealtime mobilisation, observations of the patients' mobilisation level and environment at mealtimes, focus group interviews with health care professionals at the wards, survey on mobilisation awareness among the nursing staff, a Mobilisation Initiative, and formal education for all nursing staff
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in patients mobilised at breakfastOne, two, three, four, five, and six months

Change in percentage of patients mobilised at breakfast t0-t1 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at breakfast t1-t2 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at breakfast t2-t3 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at breakfast t3-t4 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at breakfast t4-t5 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at breakfast t5-t6

Change in patients mobilised at lunchOne, two, three, four, five, and six months

Change in percentage of patients mobilised at lunch t0-t1 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at lunch t1-t2 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at lunch t2-t3 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at lunch t3-t4 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at lunch t4-t5 Change in percentage of patients mobilised at lunch t5-t6

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Mobilisation InitiativeOne and six months

The utilisation of the Mobilisation Initiative recorded as the daily number of patients referred to and mobilised in the Mobilisation Initiative at each ward

Change in chairs present bedside at breakfastTwo, three, four, five, and six months

Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at breakfast for each patient t1-t2 Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at breakfast for each patient t2-t3 Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at breakfast for each patient t3-t4 Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at breakfast for each patient t4-t5 Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at breakfast for each patient t5-t6

Formal EducationFour and five months

The number of nursing staff attending formal education

Change in chairs present bedside at lunchTwo, three, four, five, and six months

Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at lunch for each patient t1-t2 Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at lunch for each patient t2-t3 Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at lunch for each patient t3-t4 Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at lunch for each patient t4-t5 Change in percentage of chairs observed placed bedside at lunch for each patient t5-t6

Awareness of mobilisation among the nursing staffTwo months and follow up at eight months

Levels of awareness on mobilisation among the nursing staff at each ward reported through questionnaires including the questions: "Do you feel confident mobilising your patients to sit in a chair at mealtimes?," "To what degree do you feel prepared to do a safe transfer from the bed to a chair with a patient you do not know?," and "How often do you talk to your colleagues about mobilisation?". Questions are answered on 5-item Likert scales: never, less than half of the time, half of the time, more than half of the time, and every time; and to a very low degree, to a low degree, neither/nor, to a high degree, and to a very high degree

Self-reported level of mobilisationOne and six months

Level of patient's mealtime mobilisation level reported through interview-based surveys on a 5-item ordinal scale: independently, with supervision, with the physical help of one person, with the physical help of two persons, or never sit in a chair.

Focus Group InterviewsTwo months

Description of facilitators and barriers for mobilising the patients at each ward

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Rigshospitalet

🇩🇰

Copenhagen, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath