Scrambler Therapy in the Treatment of Chronic Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Neuropathy

Interventions: Device: Scrambler Therapy
Device: Sham Therapy

Registration Number: NCT02111174

Lead Sponsor: Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins

Brief Summary: The purpose of this study is to see if Scrambler Therapy with the Calmare MC5-A machine will relieve chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN).

Scrambler Therapy is a method of pain relief given with common electrocardiography (ECG) skin electrodes. The electrodes are placed on the body in pairs, and the Scrambler Therapy machine directs electrical signals across the field to simulate non-pain information.

Based on other studies, we think that we relieve pain with the Scrambler therapy device, but it has not been tested in a setting such as this one. This means that some of the pain relief could be due to placebo effect, or the CIPN pain going away on its own. In this study we want to compare the Scrambler Therapy with the sham therapy (the therapy that does not use the electrical signals). We hope that this study will help us determine if the Scrambler device really helps patients with CIPN.

Cancer patients with chronic, chemotherapy-related pain of 4 or more (on a 0-10 scale) for at least 3 months may be eligible to join this study.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 37

Inclusion Criteria

Men and women, 18 years of age or older with cancer
English speakers
Lower extremity CIPN neuropathy: Received neurotoxic chemotherapy (including taxanes-such as paclitaxel or docetaxel, or platinum-based compounds such as carboplatin or cis-platinum or oxaliplatin, or vinca alkaloids such as vincristine, vinblastine, or vinorelbine, or proteosome inhibitors such as bortezimib).
Pain or symptoms of lower extremity peripheral neuropathy of >3 month's duration attributed to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy
An average daily pain rating of > 4 out of 10
Life expectancy >3 months
ECOG Performance Status 0, 1, 2, or 3
Patient understands the study regimen, its requirements, risks, and discomforts, and is able and willing to sign an informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria

Any of the following: pregnant women, nursing women, women of childbearing potential or their sexual partners who are unwilling to employ adequate contraception (condoms, diaphragm, birth control pills, injections, intrauterine device [IUD], surgical sterilization, subcutaneous implants, abstinence, etc.).
Use of an investigational agent for pain control concurrently or within the past 30 days
History of an allergic reaction or previous intolerance to transcutaneous electronic nerve stimulation
Patients with implantable drug delivery systems, e.g. Medtronic Synchromed
Patients with heart stents or metal implants such as pacemakers, automatic defibrillators, cochlear implants, aneurysm clips, vena cava clips and skull plates. (Metal implants for orthopedic repair, e.g. pins, clips, plates, cages, joint replacements are allowed)
Patients with a history of myocardial infarction or ischemic heart disease within the past six months
Patients with history of epilepsy, brain damage, or symptomatic brain metastases
Prior celiac plexus block, or other neurolytic pain control treatment
Other identified causes of painful parasthesias existing prior to chemotherapy (e.g., radiation or malignant plexopathy, lumbar or cervical radiculopathy, pre-existing peripheral neuropathy of another etiology: e.g., carpal tunnel syndrome, B12 deficiency, AIDS, monoclonal gammopathy, diabetes, heavy metal poisoning amyloidosis, syphilis, hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, inherited neuropathy, etc.) that might be responsible for the patient's current neuropathic symptoms
Skin conditions such as open sores that would prevent proper application of the electrodes
Other medical or other condition(s) that in the opinion of the investigators might compromise the objectives of the study
Currently receiving anti-convulsants (such as gabapentinoids, e.g. gabapentin (Neurontin) or pregabalin (Lyrica). Because of data that support that patients do not do as well when on gabapentin or pregabalin, all patients on these medications will be weaned off them prior to study initiation. The study team will provide instructions on how to do this

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Scrambler Therapy	Scrambler Therapy	The device is a cutaneous electrical stimulator that uses electrodes placed on the skin similar to an electrocardiogram (EKG) machine, feeling similar to a tingling or bee-sting like sensation during the therapy. The electrodes are placed in areas thought to help relieve pain associated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Sham Therapy	Sham Therapy	The device is a cutaneous electrical stimulator that uses electrodes placed on the skin similar to an electrocardiogram (EKG) machine, feeling similar to a tingling or bee-sting like sensation during the therapy. The electrodes are placed in areas not thought to help relieve pain associated with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Pain as Measured by the Modified Brief Pain Index at 28 Days	Change from baseline to 28 days	To determine the change in pain from day 0 to day 28 (as measured by the Modified Brief Pain Index (BPI), question #3) with scrambler therapy in patients with chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy and pain (CIPN). The BPI short form is a pain assessment tool used with cancer patients to measure both severity of pain and interference caused by pain on 0-10 scales with higher scores indicating more pain. A negative score for the change in pain indicates improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change in Pain at 2 Months as Measured by the Modified Brief Pain Index	Change from baseline to 2 months	To determine the change in pain from day 0 to 2 months (as measured by the Modified Brief Pain Index (BPI), question #3) with scrambler therapy in patients with chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy and pain (CIPN). The BPI short form is a pain assessment tool used with cancer patients to measure both severity of pain and interference caused by pain on 0-10 scales with higher scores indicating more pain. A negative score for the change in pain indicates improvement.
Changes in Patient Reported Motor Outcomes at 3 Months	Change from baseline to 3 months	This will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CIPN20, a CIPN-specific questionnaire which includes two scales assessing sensory and motor symptoms and functioning with each question measured on a 0-3 scale. For motor there are 8 questions with a total score range from 0-24 with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms. A negative change in score indicates improvement in symptoms.
Change in Pain at 3 Months as Measured by the Modified Brief Pain Index	Change from baseline to 3 months	To determine the change in pain from day 0 to 3 months (as measured by the Modified Brief Pain Index (BPI), question #3) with scrambler therapy in patients with chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy and pain (CIPN). The BPI short form is a pain assessment tool used with cancer patients to measure both severity of pain and interference caused by pain on 0-10 scales with higher scores indicating more pain. A negative score for the change in pain indicates improvement.
Changes in Patient Reported Sensory Outcomes at 28 Days	Change from baseline to 28 days	This was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CIPN20, a CIPN-specific questionnaire which includes two scales assessing sensory and motor symptoms and functioning with each question measured on a 0-3 scale. For sensory there are 9 questions with a total score range from 0-27 with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms. A negative change in score indicates improvement in symptoms.
Changes in Patient Reported Sensory Outcomes at 2 Months	Change from baseline to 2 months	This was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CIPN20, a CIPN-specific questionnaire which includes two scales assessing sensory and motor symptoms and functioning with each question measured on a 0-3 scale. For sensory there are 9 questions with a total score range from 0-27 with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms. A negative change in score indicates improvement in symptoms.
Changes in Patient Reported Sensory Outcomes at 3 Months	Change from baseline to 3 months	This was assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CIPN20, a CIPN-specific questionnaire which includes two scales assessing sensory and motor symptoms and functioning with each question measured on a 0-3 scale. For sensory there are 9 questions with a total score range from 0-27 with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms. A negative change in score indicates improvement in symptoms.
Changes in Patient Reported Motor Outcomes at 28 Days	Change from baseline to 28 days	This will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CIPN20, a CIPN-specific questionnaire which includes two scales assessing sensory and motor symptoms and functioning with each question measured on a 0-3 scale. For motor there are 8 questions with a total score range from 0-24 with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms. A negative change in score indicates improvement in symptoms.
Changes in Patient Reported Motor Outcomes at 2 Months	Change from baseline to 2 months	This will be assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-CIPN20, a CIPN-specific questionnaire which includes two scales assessing sensory and motor symptoms and functioning with each question measured on a 0-3 scale. For motor there are 8 questions with a total score range from 0-24 with higher scores indicating more bothersome symptoms. A negative change in score indicates improvement in symptoms.
Number of Patients Who Stopped Using Opioids at 28 Days	28 days post-intervention	This will be assessed by concomitant medication review by a study team member during the 10 days of treatment. Follow-up was assessed as participant self-report over the last 10 days; all opiates were further tabulated using a morphine oral dose equivalents table to allow better comparison between patients and arms.
Number of Patients Who Stopped Using Neuroleptics at 28 Days	28 days post-intervention	This will be assessed by concomitant medication review by a study team member during the 10 days of treatment. Follow-up was assessed as participant self-report over the last 10 days; all opiates were further tabulated using a morphine oral dose equivalents table to allow better comparison between patients and arms.