Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major Depressive Disorder Patients
- Conditions
- DepressionDepressive Disorder, MajorMood DisordersDepressive Symptoms
- Interventions
- Other: Booklet of Scripts for Doctors and the Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major depressive disorder patients (ADAM)Other: Booklet of Scripts of Doctors
- Registration Number
- NCT04761757
- Lead Sponsor
- University of Malaya
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major Depressive Disorder is feasible and effective in involving patients in the decision-making process when initiating pharmacotherapy.
- Detailed Description
To examine the ability of the patient decision aid to enhance shared decision making and preparedness to make decisions pertaining to antidepressant therapy. The research team has systematically developed an Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major depressive disorder patients (ADAM) according to the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) and the Ottawa Decision Support Framework. This is a posttest-only study with nonequivalent groups to evaluate the effect of the antidepressant decision aid on patient and physician perception of shared decision making as well as patient preparedness for making pharmacotherapeutic decisions compared usual care.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 752
- Diagnosed with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)
- No psychotic symptoms
- Based on psychiatrist's clinical judgement currently in need for antidepressant treatment.
- Functional English literacy and language skills (to use the decision aid and fill out the questionnaires)
- Provides consent
- Psychosis
- Communication barriers (visual impairment, language barrier)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Intervention Arm Booklet of Scripts for Doctors and the Antidepressant Decision Aid for Major depressive disorder patients (ADAM) - Control Arm Booklet of Scripts of Doctors -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Preparation for Decision Making_Physician Perspective Immediately after the clinical encounter The physician version of the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PDMS) assesses the physician's perception of how the PDA helped patients recognize that a decision needs to be made, preparing them to communicate with their practitioner and promote patient involvement in the decision-making process. Higher scores indicate a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
Shared Decision Making_Patient Perspective Immediately after the clinical encounter The patient version of the Shared Decision Making scale (SDM-Q-9) measures the extent to which patients are involved in the decision-making process from the patient's perspective. It consists of nine items rated on a six-point Likert-type scale from"completely disagree=" to"completely agree=". Adding the score of all the items leads to a raw total between 0 and 45. Multiplying the raw score by 20/9 provides a transformed score ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate a greater extent of SDM.
Shared Decision Making_Physician Perspective Immediately after the clinical encounter The physician version of Shared Decision Making scale (SDM-Q-Doc) measures the extent to which patients are involved in the decision-making process from the physician's perspective. It consists of nine items rated on a six-point Likert-type scale from"completely disagree=" to"completely agree=". Adding the score of all the items leads to a raw total between 0 and 45. Multiplying the raw score by 20/9 provided a transformed score ranging from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate a greater extent of SDM.
Preparation for Decision Making_Patient Perspective Immediately after the clinical encounter The patient version of the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PDMS) assesses the patient's perception of how the PDA helped them recognize that a decision needs to be made, preparing them to communicate with their practitioner and promote patient involvement in the decision-making process. Higher scores indicate a higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (17)
A. H. Lee Specialist Clinic
🇲🇾Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Hospital Putrajaya
🇲🇾Putrajaya, Malaysia
Hospital Sultanah Nur Zahirah
🇲🇾Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
Pusat Perubatan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
🇲🇾Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
University of Malaya Medical Centre
🇲🇾Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Klinik Pakar Dr Yeoh & Dr Hazli Mental Health Specialist
🇲🇾Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Hospital Pusrawi
🇲🇾Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Hospital Permai
🇲🇾Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
Sultanah Aminah Hospital
🇲🇾Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia
Columbia Asia Hospital
🇲🇾Nusajaya, Johor, Malaysia
KPJ Ampang Puteri Specialist Hospital
🇲🇾Ampang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Dr Seed Specialist Clinic
🇲🇾Kepong, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Hospital Pengajar Universiti Putra Malaysia
🇲🇾Serdang, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Hospital Sultan Haji Ahmad Shah
🇲🇾Temerloh, Pahang, Malaysia
Hospital Raja Permaisuri Bainun
🇲🇾Ipoh, Perak, Malaysia
Hospital Pulau Pinang
🇲🇾George Town, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
Hospital Umum Sarawak
🇲🇾Kuching, Sarawak, Malaysia