Screening for Frailty at Home
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Interventions
- Other: SEGAm
- Registration Number
- NCT02852200
- Lead Sponsor
- CHU de Reims
- Brief Summary
"Many tools to evaluate frailty have been developed. However, at the time our study was designed, none of these instruments had been validated in terms of psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to validate the modified version of the Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGAm) frailty instrument in elderly people living at home.
It was an observational, longitudinal, prospective, multicentre study, set up in four departments (Ardennes, Marne, Meurthe-et-Moselle, Meuse) in two French regions (Champagne-Ardenne and Lorraine). Subjects was aged 65 years or more, living at home, and was able to read and understand French, with a degree of autonomy corresponding to groups 5, or 6 in the AGGIR autonomy evaluation scale. Assessment included demographic characteristics, comprehensive geriatric assessment, and the SEGAm instrument. Psychometric validation was used to study feasibility and acceptability, internal structure validity, reliability, and discriminant validity of the SEGAm instrument. "
- Detailed Description
Many tools to evaluate frailty have been developed. However, most are designed for use in the hospital setting, with the resultant drawback that they are not suitable for routine use in the community setting. A few tools have been developed for use in community-dwelling subjects, such as the Cardiovascular Health Study (CHS) developed by Fried from a cohort of subjects aged 65 and older; the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures (SOF); or the SHARE frailty instrument, developed in a cohort of the same name comprising subjects aged 50 years and older living at home. However, at the time our study was designed, none of these instruments had been validated in terms of psychometric properties. The aim of this study was to validate the modified version of the Short Emergency Geriatric Assessment (SEGAm) frailty instrument in elderly people living at home. It was an observational, longitudinal, prospective, multicentre study, set up in four departments (Ardennes, Marne, Meurthe-et-Moselle, Meuse) in two French regions (Champagne-Ardenne and Lorraine). Subjects was aged 65 years or more, living at home, and was able to read and understand French, with a degree of autonomy corresponding to groups 5, or 6 in the AGGIR autonomy evaluation scale. Assessment included demographic characteristics, comprehensive geriatric assessment, and the SEGAm instrument. Psychometric validation was used to study feasibility and acceptability, internal structure validity, reliability, and discriminant validity of the SEGAm instrument.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 167
- Age: 65 years or more
- Living at home
- Able to read and understand French
- With a degree of autonomy corresponding to groups 5, or 6 in the AGGIR autonomy evaluation scale
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description SEGAm SEGAm Elderly community-dwelling people
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The psychometric properties of SEGAm measured by questionnaire 12 months after inclusion The SEGAm to be validated comprises Sheet A, which evaluates frailty per se on a 13-item scale, with each item graded either 0 (most favourable state), 1, or 2 (least favourable state), thus making it possible to classify subjects into three groups: not very frail (score ≤8), frail (8\<score ≤11), and very frail (score\> 11). The SEGAm was administered by social workers, ergotherapists, nurses and non-medical personnel trained in administration of the instrument.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Chu de Reims
🇫🇷Reims, France