Comparison of Different Anterior Cruciate Ligament Surgery Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients.
Active, not recruiting
- Conditions
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture
- Interventions
- Procedure: ACL-reconstruction
- Registration Number
- NCT04644497
- Lead Sponsor
- Aarhus University Hospital
- Brief Summary
This cohort study compares to groups of patients with reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Patients in group 1 had ACL-reconstruction in the years 2001-2010 with a transphyseal drilling technique. Patient in group 2 had ACL-reconstruction in the years 2013-2018 with a physeal sparing technique.
Data including: x-ray exam, patient reported questionnaires and clinical evaluation will be compared between the 2 groups.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Inclusion Criteria
- ACL reconstruction as skeletally immature
Exclusion Criteria
- Other ligament injuries in index knee
- Other ligament injuries in opposite knee
- Revision ACL reconstruction
- Pregnant
- Not able to read or understand the danish languages
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Transphyseal drilling technique ACL-reconstruction - Physeal sparing drilling technique ACL-reconstruction -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Leg-length differences 2 Years Follow-up X-ray evaluation
Knee Angle differences 2 Years Follow-up X-ray evaluation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Tegner-Questionnaire 2 Years Follow-up Tegner (Activity function score)
KOOS- Questionnaire 2 Years Follow-up Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Knee Laxity 2 Years Follow-up Clinical evaluation with rolimeter (arthrometer)
IKDC-Questionnaire 2 Years Follow-up The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC Questionnaire)
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Aarhus University Hospital
🇩🇰Aarhus N, Denmark