Comparison results of two methods of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery
Phase 2
- Conditions
- ACL.Sprain and strain involving (anterior)(posterior) cruciate ligament of knee
- Registration Number
- IRCT201105166497N1
- Lead Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for research, Kerman University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 70
Inclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria are: ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) injuries within last five months, normal opposite knee, feasibility of completing specific rehabilitation program, willingness to follow up.
Exclusion criteria are: previous knee surgery (Arthroscopy or Meniscus surgery), associated ligament injury, grade 3 or 4 chondral damage, abnormal radiographies.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Knee stability. Timepoint: three months and one year after operation. Method of measurement: by KT2000.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method IKDC (international knee demographic). Timepoint: three and one year after operation. Method of measurement: IKDC questionnaire.;KOOS(knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score). Timepoint: three and one year after operation. Method of measurement: KOOS questionnaire.;Passive flexion of knee. Timepoint: three and one year after operation. Method of measurement: physical test.;Lysholm score. Timepoint: three and one year after operation. Method of measurement: Lysholm questionnaire.;Isometric hamstring strength of knee. Timepoint: one year after operation. Method of measurement: Maximum peak torque deficit of normal limp.;Isokinetic hamstring strength of knee. Timepoint: one year after operation. Method of measurement: Maximum peak torque deficit of normal limp.