Radial Versus Femoral Arterial Access for Cardiac Catheterization: Comparison of Complications at 30 Days
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 243
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- To determine if there is a difference in complication rate measured at 30 days between radial and femoral catheterization
研究概览
简要总结
Cardiac catheterization has traditionally been performed via access to the arterial circulation from the femoral artery located in the groin. As an alternative to this approach, the radial artery, located in the arm, is gaining wider use in clinical practice. Multiple studies have demonstrated that cardiac catheterization via the radial approach has a very low complication rate, in the short term. This study is intended to determine if there are any differences in the long term complication rate between radial artery cardiac catheterization as compared with femoral artery cardiac catheterization.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 19 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Male or Female
- •19 years old or older
- •candidate for radial or femoral cardiac catheterization
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
To determine if there is a difference in complication rate measured at 30 days between radial and femoral catheterization
时间窗: 30 days
次要结局
未报告次要终点
