Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04701450
NCT04701450
Completed
N/A

Questionnaire Study to Evaluate Patient Satisfaction Between Digital, Telephonic and Conventional Obtaining of Consent for Anaesthesia

Medical University of Vienna1 site in 1 country750 target enrollmentDecember 1, 2020

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Patient Satisfaction
Sponsor
Medical University of Vienna
Enrollment
750
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Patient satisfaction after informed consent
Status
Completed
Last Updated
2 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators aim to evaluate patient satisfaction between three methods of obtaining informed consent for anaesthesia. Patients are asked to partake in a short survey after being informed about the anaesthetic procedure either conventionally in the anesthesia department, telephonically or digitally.

Detailed Description

Patient satisfaction plays an important role to improve the process of medical procedures as well as patient outcome. Evaluating the subjectively experienced satisfaction is challenging. The investigators will use a questionnaire and assess waiting times in the process to determine patient satisfaction between digital, telephonic and conventional obtaining of informed consent for anaesthesia. In this questionnaire study, patients are asked to partake in a survey after the process of obtaining consent for anaesthesia is completed. The questionnaire covers aspects of patient satisfaction with the process, such as subjective assessment of comprehensibility, waiting time and privacy. Patients are divided into three groups. In one group, consent is obtained conventionally, in form of a visit to our anaesthesia department. In the other two groups, consent is obtained telephonically and digitally, respectively. Patients are not randomised into these groups, but included into the study after the process of obtaining consent by one of the three methods mentioned above is completed.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
December 1, 2020
End Date
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
2 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

David M Baron, MD, PhD

Assoc. Prof. PD Dr. David Baron, EDIC

Medical University of Vienna

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients for whom consent for anaesthesia is obtained

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Language barrier
  • Patients with appointed legal guardians
  • Patients unable to provide informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Patient satisfaction after informed consent

Time Frame: Immediately after obtaining informed consent

Assessment of subjectively experienced satisfaction with the process of obtaining informed consent for anesthesia

Secondary Outcomes

  • Time expense of informed consent(Up to 60 minutes; from start until end of informed consent)
  • Intraoperative complications(Up to 12 hours; From start until end of the planned surgical procedure)
  • Overall waiting time of patients(Up to three hours; from administration for informed consent until completion of informed consent)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials