跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04599101
NCT04599101终止不适用

Effectiveness of Nasal Suction in Infants With Bronchiolitis Using a NoseFrida vs. Bulb Syringe

Corewell Health East2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 21 人开始时间: 2020年11月21日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
21
试验地点
2
主要终点
Number of Emergency Room Visits

研究概览

简要总结

This research study will evaluate the difference in effectiveness of nasal suction between two different suction devices (NoseFrida and bulb syringe) in infants that have bronchiolitis. Bronchiolitis (a virus infection that goes into the lungs, which subsequently causes difficulty breathing, difficulty sleeping, and difficulty eating and drinking in children) is a common infection in young children. The caregiver-participants will be supplied with a suction devices (either NoseFrida and bulb syringe suction). The device should be used to clear nasal secretions as needed following discharge from the Emergency Center. The participants will be asked to use either a NoseFrida device or a bulb syringe. Caregivers will monitor how well their baby is breathing, eating/drinking, sleeping and how many times the baby has been seen by a medical provider in the 5 days post discharge from the Emergency Center. Post discharge, caregivers will complete a REDCAP survey asking questions about how their baby has been doing over the first 5 days following hospital discharge. REDCAP survey will be sent day 5 and again on day 7 if not completed. This completes study involvement.

详细描述

Bronchiolitis is common infection in the small airways of the lungs in the pediatric population. It typically affects children under the age of two years during the fall and winter months.Infants with this condition often have a significant amount of nasal drainage and congestion. Infants are known to be obligate nasal breathers. When the nasal secretions block the nasal airway, then breathing, sleeping, and eating/drinking all become very difficult. For this reason it is very important to have a good method of suctioning out the nose and clearing out the secretions. Historically a baby's nose was suctioned with a bulb syringe. These are still commonly used and are given out in the hospital setting, although there are many other types of devices that have been developed recently that are used for suctioning. One of these devices that has become very common among parents now is called the NoseFrida. It is important to evaluate this device and its efficacy compared to the bulb syringe.

This research study will evaluate the difference in effectiveness of nasal suction between two different suction devices (NoseFrida and bulb syringe) in infants that have bronchiolitis. Bronchiolitis (a virus infection that goes into the lungs, which subsequently causes difficulty breathing, difficulty sleeping, and difficulty eating and drinking in children) is a common infection in young children. Patients will be considered for enrollment in the study based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. The patient's caregiver will be supplied with an information sheet, and any questions will be addressed. Those who verbally consent will be enrolled in the study. After parents or guardians (caregivers) provide informed consent for their child, researchers will review the child's medical record for information regarding their history of respiratory distress. The caregiver will then be supplied with a suction device to be used once they are discharged home. The participants will be asked to use a NoseFrida device or a bulb syringe. The device supplied which is instructed to be used will be dependent on the week of enrollment in the study. Education will be given on how to use their respective the suction device devices. Along with the device, a form (Home monitoring form) will be supplied that will outline what should be monitored while using the device, including: number of days after discharge until respiratory symptoms resolve, number of days until the infant is eating/drinking well, and the number of days until the infant is sleeping well. A REDCAP survey will be emailed to participants after 5 days post discharge and again 7 days post discharge if not completed.

The protocol was revised to supply both nasal suction devices to the participants. However, no data was collected under this revised protocol before termination.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
— 至 18 Months(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Infants 18 months of age or younger
  • Evaluated in the Emergency Center at Beaumont, Royal Oak
  • Diagnosis of bronchiolitis, or presenting symptoms that are consistent with this diagnosis, such as cough, difficulty in breathing, wheezing, decreased oral intake, Fever
  • Initial Emergency Center visit for the current illness

排除标准

  • Clinically ill, as defined by: Requiring respiratory support (ex. O2 nasal canula, or HFNC) or Abnormal respiratory rate on most recent measurement, per Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) guidelines: Infant- >53 breaths per minute, Toddler- >37 breaths per minute
  • Any history of structural upper airway disease, including Cleft palate, Tracheomalacia/laryngomalacia or Subglottic stenosis
  • Previously enrolled in the study

结局指标

主要结局

Number of Emergency Room Visits

时间窗: 5 days

Number of emergency room visits for the same respiratory illness within 5 days following discharge, measured via caregiver response on Redcap survey

Number of Participants Readmitted to Hospital for Respiratory Illness or Dehydration

时间窗: 5 days

Number of participants readmitted to Hospital for respiratory illness or dehydration within 5 days following discharge, measured via caregiver response on Redcap survey

次要结局

  • Number of Days After Discharge Until Respiratory Symptoms Return to Pre-illness Levels(7 days)
  • Number of Days After Discharge Until Sleeping Returns to Pre-illness Levels(7 days)
  • Number of Days After Discharge Until Eating/Drinking Returns to Pre-illness Levels(7 days)
  • Parental Satisfaction on Suction Product Efficacy(7 days)
  • Caregiver Device Preference(5 days)
  • Caregiver Perception of NoseFrida Device Effectiveness(5 days)
  • Caregiver Perception of Bulb Device Effectiveness(5 days)
  • Parental Satisfaction on Ease of Use(7 days)
  • Participant Recommendation to Other Parents(7 days)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Margaret J Menoch, MD

Emergency Medicine Physician

Corewell Health East

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验