Promoting Mental Health and Wellbeing Through a School-based Intervention - a Study Using a Mixed-methods, Quasi-experimental Extended Selection Cohorts Design
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 2,476
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Change in subjective wellbeing (global life satisfaction - future)
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of this study is to develop a teaching material built on the Five Ways to Wellbeing and investigate its effects on wellbeing and mental health among school pupils aged 10 to 16 years in Moss municipality, Norway. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- How do participating pupils, teachers, and other school personnel experience the teaching material - is it acceptable and experienced as useful?
- What are the immediate and long-term effects of the teaching material on the pupils' wellbeing and mental health?
- For whom is the teaching material effective, and what mechanisms may explain potential improvements in wellbeing after exposure to the teaching material?
Pupils will be given a teaching program at school, delivered by their teacher. Participating pupils and their teachers will be invited to complete questionnaires. Some teachers, school leaders, school health nurses, and parents will be invited to share their experiences with the teaching material in focus group discussions.
详细描述
Background:
Mental health problems are common among children and adolescents worldwide, and the prevalence of mental distress and common mental disorders has increased in recent years. The recent Coronavirus pandemic has been challenging for the mental health and wellbeing of many children and adolescents; and in Norway higher levels of depressive symptoms and less optimistic future life expectations have been observed among adolescents as a result of the pandemic.The global challenge of mental health problems calls for different approaches; both treating mental health disorders, preventing mental health problems, and promoting mental health and wellbeing for all. School-based interventions are a primary tool in universal prevention to promote mental health and wellbeing, but well-designed interventions with proven long-term effects are rare.
The aim:
The aim of this study is to develop a teaching material built on the Five Ways to Wellbeing and investigate its effects on wellbeing and mental health among school pupils aged 10 to 16 years in Moss municipality, Norway.
The objectives are:
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 10 Years 至 —(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Being a pupil in 5th to 10th grade in a public school in Moss municipality, OR
- •Being a teacher who teaches the Five Ways at School to a school class in one of the participating schools.
排除标准
- •None. However, one school for pupils with special needs (n=18) does not participate in the study.
研究组 & 干预措施
Intervention from November 2023
Pupils in this arm receive the teaching material from November 2023
干预措施: 5Ways@School (Behavioral)
Wait-list control from November 2023 and intervention from January 2024
Pupils in this arm constitute a control group from November 2023 until they receive the teaching material from January 2024
干预措施: 5Ways@School (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Change in subjective wellbeing (global life satisfaction - future)
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
As a measure of the pupils' expected future wellbeing, a version of the Cantril Ladder Scale will be used, one that has been used in the Young in Norway study (Cantril, 1965). Pupils are asked to estimate how good or bad their life will be in five years from now, on a scale from 0 (feeling very poor) to 10 (feeling very well).
Change in subjective wellbeing (life satisfaction and self-esteem)
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
The following measures of life satisfaction and self-esteem will be assessed on a four-point scale ranging from "totally agree" to "totally disagree": "My life is good", "I have all I want in life", "I like myself the way I am", and "I am very satisfied with how I am".
Change in subjective wellbeing (global life satisfaction - present)
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
As a measure of present wellbeing, a version of the Cantril Ladder Scale will be used, one that has been used in the Young in Norway study (Cantril, 1965). Pupils are asked to evaluate their life at the present time, on a scale from 0 (feeling very poor) to 10 (feeling very well).
Change in subjective wellbeing (satisfaction with different life domains)
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
Satisfaction with the different life domains will be measured by asking the pupils "how satisfied are you with the following aspects of your life: your parents, your friends, your school, your neighborhood, your health, and your appearance?". Pupils respond to each item on a four-point scale ranging from "not at all" to "very satisfied".
Change in social relationships (friends in general)
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
Relationships with friends will be assessed by asking the pupils: "Do you have a friend whom you can trust and talk to about everything?", with response options "Yes, I am sure", "Yes, I think so", "I don't think so", and "I have no friends, nowadays".
Change in social relationships (friends during leisure time and school breaks)
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
The pupils will be asked two items; "Do you have \[a friend\] to be with during 1) your leisure time and 2) in the school breaks?" These items will be measured by a four-point scale ranging from "Yes, always" to "No, never".
Change in depressive symptoms
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
Depressive symptoms will be measured by Kandel and Davies's six-item Depressive Mood Inventory, assessing depressive symptoms during the preceding week on a four-point scale from 'affected not at all' to 'affected extremely'. In addition, the prosocial items from the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) will be used.
Change in loneliness
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
Loneliness will be assessed by one item on feelings of loneliness in the past week, on a four-point scale from 'affected not at all' to 'affected extremely'.
Change in leisure activities (time spent per week)
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
The respondents' weekly leisure activities will be assessed with the following items: "In your leisure time, how often do you 1) meet with friends in their homes, 2) hang out with friends \[outdoor\], 3) exercise or do sports, 4) ride a horse, 5) stay at a youth activity club, 6) play an instrument, 7) do things together with your family, 8) help at home doing chores, 9) relax on your own most of the evening". The pupils will respond on a six-point scale ranging from "never" to "every day".
Acceptability and feasibility 2 (teachers)
时间窗: Post-intervention at week 7 and 12, respectively
The teachers who will be teaching the interventions will be asked: "Based on your experiences, which of the five elements in the 5Ways@School do you think was 1) most useful for the pupils?, easiest for you to teach, and 3) most challenging for you to teach?" The teachers will respond to these questions by choosing any of the five elements of the 5Ways@School: Take notice, Be active, Keep Learning, Connect, and Give.
Acceptability and feasibility 3 (pupils)
时间窗: Post-intervention at week 7 and 12, respectively
The pupils will be given a questionnaire with the following items: "1) I enjoyed learning about 5Ways@School, 2) I learned something new, that I can make use of, 3) The teaching was easy to understand, 4) The teaching was boring, 5) The teaching was interesting, 6) There was too little activities, 7) There was too much activities, 8) The teaching made me sad, afraid, or angry, 9) The teaching made me happy, 10) I will practise more of the five ways in the future, 11) I think all pupils should learn about the five ways." The pupils will respond on a four-point scale from "agree completely" to "disagree completely"
Change in leisure activities and screen time (time spent per day)
时间窗: Week 0, 7, 12, 17, and 52
The respondents' daily leisure activities and screen time will be assessed with the following items: "In your leisure time, how many hours a day do you 1) watch tv, tv series, or online videos 2) read books, 3) play computer games, 4) play games on your mobile phone, 5) use social media, 6) read/watch news". The pupils will respond on a six-point scale ranging from "no time" to "3 hours or more".
Acceptability and feasibility 1 (teachers)
时间窗: Post-intervention at week 7 and 12, respectively
The teachers will respond on a four-point scale from "agree completely" to "disagree completely" to the following items: "1) I was well motivated to teach the 5Ways@School, 2) I enjoyed teaching the 5Ways@School, 3) Teaching life skills through the 5Ways@School is a natural part of my job as a teacher, 4) I got sufficient information and/or training before I started teaching the 5Ways@School, 5) I think the pupils learned something new and useful, 6) There was too little activities in the 5Ways@School, 7) There was too much activities in the 5Ways@School, 8) I followed the teaching manual to a high degree, 9) I completed all the six lessons in the 5Ways@School, 10) I had to abbreviate one or more lesson(s), 11) I think that the 5Ways@School should be part of the ordinary school curriculum in 5h to 7th grade, and 12) I think that the 5Ways@School should be part of the ordinary school curriculum in 8th to 10th grade."
次要结局
- Other demographics(Week 0 and 17)
- Pupils' knowledge of other health promoting programs(Post-intervention at week 7 and 12, respectively)
- Socio-economic status(Week 0 and 17)
研究者
Kristian Green Krogshus, MD
District Medical Officer and PhD candidate
Moss Kommune
