MedPath

Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty, Radiological Features Comparing Lateral Versus Anterolateral Approach

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hemiarthroplasty
Heterotopic Ossification
Femoral Neck Fractures
Interventions
Procedure: Hemiarthroplasty
Registration Number
NCT03974698
Lead Sponsor
Sorlandet Hospital HF
Brief Summary

Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty, Radiological Features Comparing Lateral Versus Anterolateral Approach. Comparing leg length discrepancy, femoral offset, valgus/varus position of the stem. Also is there a difference in heterotopic ossification at 12 months.

Detailed Description

Between January 2014 and July 2017 a RCT was conducted at Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway. The trial was approved by the regional ethics committee (2013/1853/REK) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02028468). This study is a follow-up on the same study population.

150 patients (70 to 90 years) with a displaced femoral neck fracture was randomized to be operated With either anterolateral og Direct lateral surgical approach. Investigators want to compare the radiological features of the femoral stem between the two Groups.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients between 70 and 90 years of age with displaced femoral neck fractures
  • Intact cognitive function
  • Ability to walk with or without a walking aid prior to falling.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Dementia
  • Fractures in pathologic bone
  • Patients not belonging to the hospital community
  • Patients with sepsis or local infection
  • Fracture not eligible to be treated with a hemiarthroplasty

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Anterolateral approachHemiarthroplastyStandard x-ray on all operated patients was taken pre- and postoperative and at 3 and 12 moths. Including an AP pelvis and lateral view of the hip.
Lateral approachHemiarthroplastyStandard x-ray on all operated patients was taken pre- and postoperative and at 3 and 12 moths. Including an AP pelvis and lateral view of the hip.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Leg lengthImmediately after surgery

The perpendicular distance between a horizontal line passing through the lower edge of the teardrop to the ipsilateral center of the femoral head

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Canal fill ratioImmediately after surgery

Was evaluated at the following points; 2 cm above the lower trochanter, at the tip of the lower trochanter, 2 cm and 7 cm below the tip of lesser trochanter

Valgus/varus stem positionImmediately after surgery

Stem position in relation to the femoral axis

Heterotopic ossification1 year

Classified as type 1-4 according to Brooker classification

Femoral offsetImmediately after surgery

The distance between the longitudinal axis of the femur to the centre of the femoral head and the distance from the centre of the femoral head to a perpendicular line passing through the medial edge of the teardrop

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Sorlandet Hospital

🇳🇴

Kristiansand, Norway

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath