MedPath

A Head-to-head Study Comparing the Functional Value of Two Models of Robotically Assisted Rehabilitation in SMA (Spinal Muscular Atrophy) Patients

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
SMA
Registration Number
NCT06322654
Lead Sponsor
Wiktor Dega University Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Hospital
Brief Summary

A head-to-head study comparing the functional value of two models of robotically assisted rehabilitation in patients with SMA. A single-center, randomized, single-blinded, comparative study of Robotically Assisted Verticalization versus Robotically Assisted Locomotion.

The objective of research:

The main goal of the project is to determine the optimal robotically assisted rehabilitation model for people with SMA depending on age and baseline functional status. The study consists of a head-to-head comparison of two rehabilitation models.

1. Research period: 4 years

2. Patients age: 0-21 y.o.

3. Group size: 200 patients (100 patients in each group)

4. Assignment of patients to study groups in a randomised manner

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Signing of informed consent to participate in the experiment by the participant or the participant's parent/legal guardian
  • Diagnosis of SMA (spinal muscular atrophy 1-4) confirmed by genetic testing, symptomatic or pre-symptomatic
  • Age between 0 and 21 years of age (will be determined on the day of starting participation in the project based on the date of birth)
  • Treatment under a drug program for spinal muscular atrophy, provided that the patient has a diagnosis of spinal muscular atrophy at the date of eligibility.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Cardio-respiratory disorders requiring invasive ventilation
  • Advanced osteoporosis with multiple fractures prior to treatment
  • Functional deterioration during the rehabilitation process in the range of scales appropriately selected for the SMA type: Prechtl, HINE, CHOP-INTEND, HFMS, RULM
  • Lack of cooperation with the therapist
  • Other functional indications preventing exercise

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
X-ray or ultrasound scan imaging assessment of the spine, hip joints and bone mineral densityOnce per 1 year
Assessment of the quality of life of patients and their caregivers using Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory ver. 4.0Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Clinical assessment of patients using Children's Hospital Of Philadelphia Infant Test Of Neuromuscular Disorders, Revised Upper Limb Module, Hammersmith Functional Motor ScaleThrough study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Clinical assessment of patients using Balance test minimum 1 min., Self-walk test of at least 2 meters, 6-minute gait test, Up&Go test, 10 meters gait test, hip range of motion and muscle strength evaluation.Through study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Functional assessment of patients using GMFM (Gross Motor Function Measure) scaleThrough study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Occurence of discomfort during therapy requiring abrupt interruption or significant modificationThrough study completion, max. for 2.5 year every 6 months
Hospitalization during or between rehabilitations that take place each 6 monthsThrough study completion, max. for 2.5 year
Number of fracturesThrough study completion, max. for 2.5 year

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Wiktor Dega University Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Hospital

🇵🇱

Poznań, Poland

Wiktor Dega University Orthopedic and Rehabilitation Hospital
🇵🇱Poznań, Poland
Marek Jóźwiak
Contact
696052475
sma@orsk.pl
Radosław Rutkowski
Contact
696052475
sma@orsk.pl

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.