NCT03104881
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparisons of Two Types of Rehabilitation Robot for Upper Extremities: 3 Dimension Exoskeleton Type Upper Extremity Robot vs. 2 Dimension End-effector Type Robot): Randomized Controlled Trial
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea1 site in 1 country40 target enrollmentApril 2015
ConditionsStroke
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Sponsor
- National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Comparisons of two types of rehabilitation robot for upper extremities: 3 dimension exoskeleton type upper extremity robot vs. 2 dimension end-effector type robot)
Investigators
Joon-Ho Shin
Team manager
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Hemiplegic patients secondary to first cerebrovascular accidents
- •Onset ≥ 3 months
- •8 ≤ Fugl-Meyer Assessment score ≤ 30
- •Shoulder or elbow flexor spasticity modified ashworth scale ≤ 3
- •Cognitively intact enough to understand and follow the instructions from the investigator
Exclusion Criteria
- •History of surgery of affected upper limb
- •Fracture of affected upper limb
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change of Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Time Frame: Fugl-Meyer Assessment change from baseline at 4 weeks
Wolf motor function test
Time Frame: Fugl-Meyer Assessment change from baseline at 4 weeks
Secondary Outcomes
- Motor status score(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Pain of upper extremity(from baseline to 4 weeks after baseline)
- Reach Error(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Path Error(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Mean velocity(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Cricle size(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Beck depression index(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Wolf motor function test(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- medical research council scale of upper extremity(baseline)
- Modified Ashworth scale of upeer extremity(baseline)
- Stroke impact scale(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Smoothness(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Maximum velocity(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Cricle independence(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
- Intrinsic motivation inventory(4 weeks after baseline)
- stroke rehabilitation motivation scale(baseline, 4 weeks after baseline, 8 weeks after baseline, 10 weeks after baseline)
Study Sites (1)
Loading locations...
Similar Trials
Completed
Not Applicable
Upper Extremity Robotic Rehabilitation in Patients With HemiplegiaHemiplegia and/or Hemiparesis Following StrokeNCT04393480Sahel Taravati, M.D.37
Unknown
Not Applicable
Rehabilitation Robot in Patients With Post-Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Fatigue SyndromePost-Viral Fatigue SyndromeNCT05130736Poznan University of Medical Sciences80
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparisons of Two Types of Armeo Robot for Upper ExtremitiesStrokeNCT03465267National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea20
Unknown
Not Applicable
Comparisons of Two Types of Robot Assisted Gait TrainingStrokeRobot Assisted Gait TrainingNCT03341065National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, Korea20
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison Of Two Different Type Robot Assisted Gait Training In Rehabilitation Of StrokeStrokeNCT03565185Erenköy Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Hospital64