Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02411422
NCT02411422
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel-Assisted Blind Intubation and I-gel-assisted Bronchoscopic Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Simulation Study

Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital1 site in 1 country23 target enrollmentApril 2015
ConditionsHeart Arrest

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Heart Arrest
Sponsor
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Enrollment
23
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
intubation time
Status
Completed
Last Updated
11 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators will compare conventional intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope, blind endotracheal intubation using i-gel for conduit and bronchoscopic intubation using Ambu-aScope and i-gel. All situation assumed as cardiac arrest. i.e, someone give chest compressions continuously without interruption.

Moreover the investigators will compare the type of endotracheal tube. Reinforced tube has more soft tube tip, so the investigators think it is more acceptable for intubation using i-gel as conduit.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
April 2015
End Date
April 2015
Last Updated
11 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Crossover
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Choi Hyun Young

emergency medicine fellowship

Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • emergency physician
  • work at emergency department more than 1 year.
  • 50 or more experience of endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • having backache or wrist pain

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

intubation time

Time Frame: 1 Day

1st intubation attempt, an expected average time is 1 min.

Secondary Outcomes

  • success rate for intubation(1 Day)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials