Comparison of Efficiency Between I-gel-Assisted Blind Intubation and I-gel-assisted Bronchoscopic Intubation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Randomized Simulation Study
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Heart Arrest
- Sponsor
- Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
- Enrollment
- 23
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- intubation time
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 11 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The investigators will compare conventional intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope, blind endotracheal intubation using i-gel for conduit and bronchoscopic intubation using Ambu-aScope and i-gel. All situation assumed as cardiac arrest. i.e, someone give chest compressions continuously without interruption.
Moreover the investigators will compare the type of endotracheal tube. Reinforced tube has more soft tube tip, so the investigators think it is more acceptable for intubation using i-gel as conduit.
Investigators
Choi Hyun Young
emergency medicine fellowship
Hallym University Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •emergency physician
- •work at emergency department more than 1 year.
- •50 or more experience of endotracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- •having backache or wrist pain
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
intubation time
Time Frame: 1 Day
1st intubation attempt, an expected average time is 1 min.
Secondary Outcomes
- success rate for intubation(1 Day)