Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01007370
NCT01007370
Completed
Not Applicable

Comparison of LMA-Fastrach and I-gel for Blind Tracheal Intubation.

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)1 site in 1 country160 target enrollmentMarch 2010

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
General Anesthesia
Sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Enrollment
160
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
First attempt success rate of tracheal intubation.
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

The investigators aim to compare two different types of supraglottic devices for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Our hypothesis is that the use of the I-gel supraglottic airway will result in a higher first attempt success rate of blind tracheal intubation.

Detailed Description

Supraglottic airway devices such as LMA-Fastrach and I-gel provide patent airways during general anesthesia. The LMA-Fastrach is designed to provide a conduit for blind or fiberoptically guided tracheal intubations. However, the success rate of tracheal intubation on the first attempt through this device varies between 50 and 87%. The I-gel is a newer device for airway management which, with its wide bore, allows direct passage of a tracheal tube. Recent studies suggest that the I-gel is easy to insert and that limited experience is needed before a high success insertion rate is obtained. In this prospective and randomized study, we will evaluate the performance of both devices for tracheal intubation in patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
March 2010
End Date
May 2010
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18 and older
  • ASA physical status 1-3
  • Patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia, requiring endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria

  • ASA physical status 4-5
  • Contraindications to muscle relaxation
  • Anticipated or known difficult intubation or ventilation
  • Patients with limited mouth opening (less than 2 cm)
  • Patients at increased risk of aspiration, or having an history of symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux or hiatal hernia.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

First attempt success rate of tracheal intubation.

Time Frame: After successful insertion of tracheal tube

Secondary Outcomes

  • Time needed for successful insertion of a supraglottic device.(After insertion)
  • First and total attempt success rate of supraglottic device insertion.(After insertion)
  • Total time and number of attempts needed to obtain successful tracheal intubation.(After tracheal intubation)
  • Fiberoptic view following the supraglottic device insertion.(After insertion of the device)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials