MedPath

Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Method in the Treatment of Shoulder Problems

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pain
Shoulder Syndrome
Interventions
Other: CT+MWM
Other: CT
Registration Number
NCT06187571
Lead Sponsor
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Brief Summary

To determine whether Mulligan mobilization with movement (MWM) and Conservative treatment CT give different results on pain, ROM, and functional activities in participants with shoulder problems.

Detailed Description

Shoulder problems are one of the common orthopedic problems. Patients with shoulder problems experience an increase in pain and a decrease in joint movement and functionality. With conventional treatment, patients' symptoms improve. However, the MWM is one of the manual therapy techniques frequently used to reduce pain in musculoskeletal system problems. It is extremely important to evaluate patients' functionality after rehabilitation. Although there are studies comparing the effect of MWM in the literature, studies evaluating patient-specific functionality are also limited.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
41
Inclusion Criteria
  • Being over 18 years old,
  • Having any shoulder problems (impingement, rotator cuff syndrome, glenohumeral joint problems, etc.),
  • Having a history of shoulder pain lasting at least 3 months, and volunteering to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Having systemic or degenerative disease, a neurological disease, and
  • Having more than one upper extremity pathology.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MWM GroupCT+MWMThis group received treatment with the Mulligan technique.
CT GroupCTThis group received treatment with the conventional therapy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Shoulder painthrough study completion, an average of 6 month

The Numeric Pain Rating Scale was used to evaluate shoulder pain. The patient was asked to mark the point corresponding to the pain between 0 and 10. The higher the score, the higher the pain.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ROMthrough study completion, an average of 6 month

Shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation were measured using a Universal goniometer.As the angle increases, the joint range of motion increases.

Patient Specific Functional Scalethrough study completion, an average of 6 month

In the patient-specific activity scale, depending on the current pathology, the physiotherapist asks the patient three or five activities that he or she finds difficult to do. The patient is asked to score the activity between 0-10 points. The total score is determined by averaging the activity scores, with higher scores indicating better function.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Health Sciences,Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

🇹🇷

Ankara, Esenboğa, Turkey

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath