Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04408313
NCT04408313Active, not recruitingPhase 2

A Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Extended Release Naltrexone Versus Extended Release Buprenorphine With Individuals Leaving Jail

Friends Research Institute, Inc.1 site in 1 country240 target enrollmentStarted: October 28, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions
Drugs

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 2
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
240
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
pharmacotherapy adherence

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The proposed study is a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. Individuals with opioid use disorder in county jails throughout the state of Maryland will be randomly assigned within gender within jail to one of two groups: Arm 1. XR-B (n=120). XR-B in jail followed by 6 monthly injections post-release at a community treatment program. Arm 2. XR-NTX (n=120). One injection of XR-NTX in jail, followed by 6 monthly injections post-release at a community treatment program.

Detailed Description

This study is a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial. County jails willing to provide extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) and extended-release buprenorphine (XR-B) will participate in a randomized controlled trial throughout the state of Maryland, in which 240 incarcerated men and women will be randomly assigned within gender within jail to one of two arms: Arm 1. XR-B (n=120). XR-B in jail followed by 6 monthly injections post-release at a treatment program. Arm 2. XR-NTX (n=120). XR-NTX in jail, followed by 6 monthly injections post-release at a treatment program. In addition to the RCT the investigators will use a learning collaborative to examine the acceptability and feasibility of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUDs). Aim 1. To determine the effectiveness of XR-B compared to XR-NTX in terms of: Primary. (a) pharmacotherapy adherence (number of monthly injections received). Secondary. (b) illicit opioid urine test results; (c) self-reported illicit opioid use; (d) overdose events (non-fatal and fatal); (e) quality of life (i. physical health; ii. mental health); (f) HIV risk behaviors (i. sexual behavior; ii. needle use or sharing); and (g) criminal activity (i. crime days; ii. re-arrest; iii. re-incarceration). Aim 2. To use a learning collaborative involving all 7 RCT county jurisdictions as well as 3 additional counties that selected not to participate in the randomized trial to understand factors related to: (a) acceptability of providing long-acting agonists and antagonists in jail settings; and (b) feasibility of providing medication continuity of care from jail to community treatment providers. Aim 3. Calculate the cost to the correctional health system of implementing an XR-B or XR-NTX program, and determine the relative value of each strategy, including the costs associated with the subsequent interventions in the community, from a state-policymaker and societal perspective.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult male or female inmates at participating jails who are eligible for release within 120 days
  • History of opioid use disorder (meeting DSM-5 criteria of moderate or severe opioid use disorder at the time of incarceration; individuals not meeting the opioid-disorder criterion will be eligible if they were treated in an opioid agonist treatment program during the year before incarceration)
  • Suitability for XR-B and/or XR-NTX treatment as determined by medical evaluation
  • Willingness to enroll in XR-B or XR-NTX treatment in jail
  • Planning to live in one of the 7 participating counties and/or surrounding counties

Exclusion Criteria

  • Liver function test levels greater than 4 times normal;
  • Active medical illness that may make participation hazardous (e.g., unstable diabetes, heart disease; moderate to severe renal impairment; adequately treated medical conditions are acceptable);
  • Conditions or medications that may predispose to QTc prolongation (personal or family history of long QT syndrome, hypokalemia, medications that prolong QTc interval, e.g., macrolide antibiotics, azole antifungal compounds, anti-arrythmics, antipsychotics and antidepressant)
  • Untreated psychiatric disorder that may make participation hazardous (e.g., untreated psychosis, bipolar disorder with mania; adequately treated psychiatric disorders and appropriate psychotropic medications will be allowed);
  • History of allergic reaction to naltrexone and/or buprenorphine;
  • Current chronic pain diagnosis for which opioids are prescribed;
  • Pregnancy (for women);
  • Breast-feeding (for women);
  • Suicidal ideation (within the past 6 months);
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40;
  • Inability to pass a study enrollment quiz;
  • Currently enrolled in jail-based MOUD pharmacotherapy (methadone, buprenorphine, naltrexone)
  • Enrolled in a methadone treatment program in the past 30 days.

Arms & Interventions

XR-B

Experimental

Extended-release buprenorphine

Intervention: XR-B (Drug)

XR-NTX

Active Comparator

Extended-release naltrexone

Intervention: XR-NTX (Drug)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pharmacotherapy adherence

Time Frame: 6-months post-release

number of monthly injections received (0-6)

Secondary Outcomes

  • illicit opioid urine screening test results(1-7,12-months)
  • self-reported illicit opioid use(Baseline, 1-7,12-months)
  • overdose events(Baseline, 1-7,12-months)
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System(Baseline, 1-7,12-months)
  • Risk Assessment Battery (RAB)(Baseline, 1-7,12-months)
  • Criminal activity(Baseline, 1-7,12-months)
  • Re-arrest(12-months)
  • Re-incarceration(12-months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Extended Release Naltrexone Versus... | Clinical Trial