Comparative evaluation of Effectiveness of indigenous MV loop design for complete anterior teeth movement as compared to Opus and Snail loop designs using finite element method and clinical intervention.
Phase 2
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K088- Other specified disorders of teethand supporting structuresHealth Condition 2: Z00-Z13- Persons encountering health services for examinations
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/06/054509
- Lead Sponsor
- Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
1.Patients with Class I with Deweyâ??s modification type 2.
2.Moderate Anchorage cases
3.1st premolar extraction case.
4.Complete dentition cases with age 18-30 years.
Exclusion Criteria
1.Periodontally compromised cases.
2.Missing or grossly carious 1st molar cases.
3.Coronal coverage and restoration.
4.T-loop â?? it is similar to MV loop, but as the loop has moment to force ratio of 6:1, it does not provide translation. Therefore, loop which provide moment to force ratio close to 10 are selected for study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method