Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of LIPO-202 for the Reduction of Central Abdominal Bulging Due to Subcutaneous Fat (AbCONTOUR2)
- Registration Number
- NCT02398188
- Lead Sponsor
- Evofem Inc.
- Brief Summary
This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study evaluating the safety and efficacy of LIPO-202 for the reduction of central abdominal bulging due to subcutaneous fat in non-obese subjects.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 793
- Healthy male or non-pregnant female subjects
- Capable of providing written consent.
- BMI < 30 kg/m2
- Stable diet and exercise routine
- Central abdominal bulging that is evaluated by the clinician at least slight bulge, not flat
- Have had any treatment of the fat around your abdomen, including surgical procedures (tummy tuck, liposuction), injections for fat loss or treatments with devices to reduce fat in your abdomen.
- Plan on starting a weight loss or exercise program during the study.
- Known hypersensitivity to study drugs
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description LIPO-202 LIPO-202 Experimental arm Placebo Placebo Placebo comparator
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Subjects Who Achieved a Composite P-GAPS1/CPnS2 Response Baseline and End of Study (1 week post last treatment, 9 weeks after first treatment) The composite P-GAPS1/CPnS2 response was defined as at least a 1 point (grade) improvement in P-GAPS and at least a 2 point (grade) improvement in CPnS from baseline after 8 weeks of treatment.
Patient - Global Abdominal Perception Scale (P-GAPS) - a patient views and assesses the contour of their abdomen on a 5-point verbal scale ranging from "Flat" to "Big Bulge".
Clinician Photonumeric Scale (CPnS) - a trained clinician rater examines the subject's abdomen and matches the subject's abdominal bulge/profile to the nearest gender-specific abdominal photo on the 6-point scale.Percent Change in the Patient Reported Global Abdominal Perception Score 8 weeks post the start of treatment 1 equals much improved, 7 equals much worse. The higher the scores the worse the outcome.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent Change in Waist Circumference 8 weeks post the start of treatment
Trial Locations
- Locations (35)
Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Stoll Dermatology of Beverly Hills
🇺🇸Beverly Hills, California, United States
Diagnamics, Inc.
🇺🇸Encinitas, California, United States
Ablon Skin Institute And Research Center
🇺🇸Manhattan Beach, California, United States
Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
🇺🇸Oceanside, California, United States
Rancho Mirage Dermatology
🇺🇸Rancho Mirage, California, United States
Faces Plus
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Therapeutics Clinical Research
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Syrentis Clinical Research
🇺🇸Santa Ana, California, United States
Colorado Medical Research Center
🇺🇸Denver, Colorado, United States
Scroll for more (25 remaining)Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States