Intubation with Different Angled Intubation Tubes Using C-macr D Blade Videolaringoscope;
- Conditions
- Sore-throatIntubation; Difficult or FailedHoarseness
- Interventions
- Other: Intubation using C-MAC D blade videolariyngoscope
- Registration Number
- NCT06011967
- Lead Sponsor
- Yeditepe University
- Brief Summary
In this study we compared post-operative sore throat, ease and time of intubation, hoarseness, subglottic damage and hemodynamic changes to orotracheal intubation using three different intubation stylets with C-MAC R videolaryngoscope D- blade.
- Detailed Description
In this study we compared the ease of intubation, time needed for intubation, subglottic damage, postoperaitve sore throat, hoarseness and hemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation using three different intubation stylets with C-MAC R videolaryngoscope D- blade. After the approval of the Ethics Committee, patients were randomized into three groups with closed envelope technique. In Group A endotracheal tube (ETT) is shaped into an angel of 90 degrees, in Group B 80 degrees and in Group C 60 degrees with three different stylets. Laryngoscopy was performed using D-Blade in all 3 groups. Heart rate and blood pressure before and after intubation, time from the entrance of the laryngoscope into the mouth to the passage of the vocal cords, time from the appearance of the cords to intubation, Cormack-Lehane (C-L) classification were recorded. Subglottic damage was examined with fiberoptic bronchoscope. Patients were evaluated regarding postoperative sore throat and hoarsness at 30 minutes, 4, 12, 24 hours postoperatively.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 54
- ASA score I-II
- Elective operations
- Supine pozition
- 18-65 years
- No history of surgery in the last 6 months
- No history of airway related surgery
- No anticipated difficult airway
- Abdomen, thorax, head-neck surgeries
- Smoker
- Chronic alcohol abuse
- Occupational inhaler agent exposure
- Patients with malignancies
- Patients with a history of radiotheraphy to head-neck region
- Patients with congenital anomalies at head-neck region
- Patients with diagnosed abnormalites of head -neck movements
- Non-cooperatied patients
- Non-oriented patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group C: 60 degree Intubation using C-MAC D blade videolariyngoscope In this group patients were intubated using a 60 degree angled stylet with C-MAC D- Blade videolaryngoscope Group A : 90 degree Intubation using C-MAC D blade videolariyngoscope In this group patients were intubated using a 90 degree angled stylet with C-MAC D- Blade videolaryngoscope Group B : 80 degree Intubation using C-MAC D blade videolariyngoscope In this group patients were intubated using a 80 degree angled stylet with C-MAC D- Blade videolaryngoscope
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method sore throat 30 minutes, 4 hour, 12 hour, 24 hour For evaluation of sore throat, the patients were asked whether they had any throat pain. The severity of sore throat was graded as follows: 1: no sore throat, 2: minimal, 3: moderate, 4: severe
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ease of intubation 2 minutes For evaluation of the ease of intubation modified intubation difficulty score was used.
Subglottic damage 2 hours For evaluation of subglottic damage 4-point scaled subglottic damage score was used. grade 0, normal; grade 1, mucosal hyperaemia and oedema and/or slight submucosal haematoma; grade 2, moderately submucosal haematoma; grade 3, mucosal laceration and/or mucosal bleeding
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Yeditepe University
🇹🇷Istanbul, Turkey