Continuous Epidural Contrast
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- The patients required for the CT-guide procedure such as embolism of liver artery and radiofrequency of liver, which needed the epidural analgesia
- Registration Number
- JPRN-UMIN000018847
- Lead Sponsor
- Department of Anesthesiology and Resuscitology
- Brief Summary
Continuous epidural contrast was feasible. 0.75% ropivacain, omnipark and saline facilitated contrast's assessment. The clinical outcome was not consistent with the contrast.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete: follow-up complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 9
Inclusion Criteria
Not provided
Exclusion Criteria
1) allergy for contrast 2) Renal dysfunction (Serum Creatinin 2.0 mg/dL) 3)Liver dysfunction (Serum AST/ALT >100 mg/dL) 4)Severe Heart dysfunction (Ejection fraction <40%) 5)Convulsion 6)Severe asthma 7)Thyroid dysfunction 8) Diabetes using the medicine piganaid
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Our main outcome would be the possibility of continuous epidural contrast according to the diagnosis by authorized radiologists through the CT scan at the end of the procedure.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method We will collect the information regarding the safety whether to mixture the contrast with the anesthetics (0.75% ropivacaine). In addition to that, we will collect the side effects or deleterious information regarding this research such as allergy of contrast.