ORCA - Oracea® for Rosacea: A Community-based Assessment
- Conditions
- Rosacea
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT00892281
- Lead Sponsor
- Galderma R&D
- Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness, safety, subject satisfaction and quality of life with Oracea® when used as monotherapy or as add-on therapy to existing topical regimens for the treatment of rosacea.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1421
- Males and females aged 18 and older
- Subjects with diagnosis of rosacea (IGA of 2 to 4)
- Subjects who used a topical or systemic acne treatment within 4 months of the baseline visit (retinoids and isotretinoin)
- Subjects who used a topical or systemic antibiotic within 4 weeks of the baseline visit
- Subjects who had laser or IPL (intense pulsed light) treatments within 3 months of the baseline visit and/or who plan to have these treatments during the study
- Subjects who have a known hypersensitivity to tetracyclines or ingredients of the add on medications
- Subjects who have stomach or GI problems, kidney disease or have an active systemic fungal infection or a vaginal yeast infection are excluded
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Oracea® as monotherapy doxycycline (Oracea®) 40 mg modified release as monotherapy Oracea as monotherapy Oracea® as add-on therapy doxycycline (Oracea®) 40 mg modified release as add-on therapy Oracea® as add-on Therapy (Oracea® + Metronidazoles and/or Azelaic Acids and/or Sodium Sulfacetamides
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Score From Baseline to Endpoint Baseline to Week 12 Number of participants with a change (Week 12 minus Baseline) in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score. IGA is measured on a scale from 0 - 4 with 0 = Clear; 1 = Near Clear; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; and 4 = Severe. Results values (+4, +3, +2, +1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -4) represent change from Baseline to Week 12.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Clinician's Erythema Assessment Scale (CEA) Score From Baseline to Endpoint Baaseline to Week 12 Number of participants with a change (Week 12 minus Baseline) in Clinician's Erythema Assessment Scale (CEA) score. Clinician's Erythema Assessment Scale (CEA) is a scale from 0 - 4 with 0 = None; 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate; 3 = Significant; and 4 = Severe. Results values (+4, +3, +2, +1, 0, -1, -2, -3, -4) represent change from Baseline to Week 12 in CEA.
Number of Treatment Responders at Endpoint, Where Response is Defined as an IGA Score of 0 (Clear) or 1 (Near Clear) Baseline to Week 12 Number of treatment responders at week 12, where response is defined as an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (near clear). IGA is measured on a scale from 0 - 4 with 0 = Clear, 1 = Near Clear; 2 = Mild; 3 = Moderate; and 4 = Severe with 0 being best and 4 being worst.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
REGISTRAT® - MAP1, Inc. (CRO)
🇺🇸Lexington, Kentucky, United States