MedPath

Video Laryngeal Mask Versus Endotracheal Tube Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Cholecystitis
Interventions
Device: Video laryngeal mask airway
Device: Endotracheal tube
Registration Number
NCT06502028
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of using a video laryngeal mask for airway management in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed Description

The investigators will compare the time required to secure the airway when inserting a video laryngeal mask (LMA) versus performing endotracheal intubation.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
102
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients over 19 years old
  • Patients planned for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Exclusion Criteria
  • High risk of aspiration (e.g. gastro-esophageal reflux disease, hiatus hernia, pregnancy, history of gastrectomy)
  • Difficult airway (e.g. limitation of mouth opening, limitation of neck extension, oropharyngeal pathology)
  • Obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2)
  • Tooth mobility

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Video LMAVideo laryngeal mask airwayThe airway is secured with a video laryngeal mask airway (VLMA).
ControlEndotracheal tubeThe participant is intubated with an endotracheal tube via direct laryngoscopy.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Time required for VLMA insertion or intubationAfter induction of anesthesia, before the operation starts.

Time required for VLMA insertion or intubation

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of trialsAfter induction of anesthesia, before the operation starts.

Video laryngeal mask airway insertion or endotracheal intubation

Peak airway pressureAfter video laryngeal mask airway insertion or intubation, before extubation

Peak airway pressure

Minute ventilationAfter video laryngeal mask airway insertion or intubation, before extubation

Minute ventilation

End tidal carbon dioxideAfter video laryngeal mask airway insertion or intubation, before extubation

End tidal carbon dioxide

Oropharyngeal leak pressureAfter video laryngeal mask airway insertion or intubation, before extubation

Oropharyngeal leak pressure

Traces of blood on airway device after extubationAfter extubation, before transfer to PACU

Traces of blood on airway device after extubation

Postoperative sore throat24 hours after end of operation

4-point scale, 0 = no sore throat; 1 = mild sore throat (complaints of sore throat only on asking); 2 = moderate sore throat (complaints of sore throat on his/her own); 3 = severe sore throat (change of voice or hoarseness, associated with throat pain)

Postoperative hoarseness24 hours after end of operation

4-point scale, 0 = no hoarseness; 1 = mild hoarseness (complaints of hoarseness only on asking); 2 = moderate hoarseness (complaints of hoarseness on his/her own); 3 = severe hoarseness (hoarseness associated with throat pain)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath