MRgFUS and RFA for Treatment of Facet-joint Osteoarthritis Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Chronic Low Back PainFacet Joint Syndrome
- Registration Number
- NCT03168802
- Lead Sponsor
- Taipei Medical University Hospital
- Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, two-arm, phase II study.
The purpose of this study is:
* To evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of facet-joint osteoarthritis low back pain.
* Determining the effect of the MRgFUS System and RFA for improving functional disabilities and in reducing pain resulting from facet-joint osteoarthritis low back pain. Efficacy will be determined by the level of pain relief (as measured by the Numerical Rating Scale, NRS), decrease in analgesics/opiate, improved quality of life (as measured by the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire, ODQ, and core outcome measures index questionnaire, COMI), pain interference with function (as measured by the Brief Pain Inventory-Interference scale, BPI-QoL), general health status (as measured by the EQ5D), physical exam, X-ray and MRI studies from baseline up to 12-Months post- MRgFUS and radiofrequency treatment.
* Evaluate incidence and severity of adverse events associated with the MRgFUS system and RFA used for the treatment of pain resulting from facet-joint osteoarthritis low back pain.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Men and women age 20 to 79 years old
- Suffering from lumbar vertebral facet joint syndrome.
- Lower back pain at least six months (NRS≥4).
- Conventional treatment of pain includes NSAIDs, opioids, muscle relaxants, oral steroids, physical therapy or chiropractic therapy.
- Imaging of the spine have facet osteoarthritis.
- Referred pain is no more below the knee.
- At least once when local anesthesia or diagnostic medial nerve branch injection, pain reduction> 75% (0.5ml of 2% lidocaine).
-
Patients with evidence of lumbosacral radiculopathy on MRI, CT or physical exam findings, including radicular leg pain.
-
Patients with motor deficit or any other indication for surgical intervention.
-
Patients with MRgFUS or RF treatment for LBP within the last 6 months.
-
Patients with previous low back surgery.
-
Patients who are pregnant.
-
Patients with existing malignancy.
-
Patients with allergies to relevant contrast, anesthetics, sedation drugs.
-
Patients with contraindications for MRI.
-
Patients with an acute medical condition (e.g., pneumonia, sepsis) that is expected to hinder them from completing this study.
-
Patients with unstable cardiac status including:
- Unstable angina pectoris on medication
- Patients with documented myocardial infarction less than 40 days prior to protocol enrolment
- Patients with Severe Congestive Heart Failure, NYHA class 4.
- Patients on anti-arrhythmic drugs or with uncontrolled and/or untreated arrhythmia status
- Patients with pacemaker
-
Patients with severe cerebrovascular disease (CVA within last 6 months)
-
Patients with severe hypertension (diastolic BP > 100 on medication)
-
Patients with an active infection or severe hematological, neurological, or other uncontrolled disease.
-
Patients unable to communicate with the investigator and staff.
-
Patients who are not able or willing to tolerate the required prolonged stationary position during treatment (approximately 2 hrs.)
-
Coagulation disorders or other bleeding disorders, use of anticoagulants or antiplatelet drugs within 5 days before treatment.
-
When local anesthesia or diagnostic medial nerve branch injection, the pain does not reach 75% (0.5 mL of 2% lidocaine).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain score change: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 24-week post-treatment Efficacy
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adverse event 1-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 52-week post-treatment Safety
Functional scales change: EQ5D Quality of Life questionnaires 1-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 52-week post-treatment Efficacy
Amount of analgesic consumption 1-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 52-week post-treatment Efficacy
Pain score change: Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) 1-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 36-, 52-week post-treatment Efficacy
Functional scales change: Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (ODQ) 1-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 52-week post-treatment Efficacy
Functional scales change: Brief Pain Inventory-Quality of Life (BPI-QoL) 1-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 52-week post-treatment Efficacy
Functional scales change: Core Outcome Measurement Index (COMI) 1-, 4-, 8-, 12-, 24-, 36-, 52-week post-treatment Efficacy
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Taipei medical university hospital
🇨🇳Taipei, Please Select, Taiwan
Taipei medical university hospital🇨🇳Taipei, Please Select, TaiwanMeng-Huang Wu, MDContact227372181maxwutmu@gmail.com