ISRCTN31135824已完成不适用
igasure haemorrhoidectomy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy: one year follow up
Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2004 Update - Department of Health (UK)0 个研究点目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2004年9月30日最近更新:
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 40
研究概览
简要总结
暂无简介。
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
入排标准
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •All 40 previous participants of the Ligasure versus conventional diathermy study
排除标准
- •Does not match inclusion criteria
研究者
相似试验
已完成
1 期
Comparison of open hemorrhoidectomy versus hemorrhoidectomy with electrocautery in patients with hemorrhoidHaemorrhoid.I84, I84.4HaemorrhoidsIRCT2016072028993N2Vice chancellor for research, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences60
尚未招募
不适用
comparitive study about treatment for secondary haemorrhoids Open Hemorrhoidectomy vs rubber band ligatioCTRI/2022/04/041713DR G RAY
已完成
不适用
igaSure technique of haemorrhoidectomy versus Ferguson Clinic haemorrhoidectomy: a randomised prospective studySurgery: HaemorrhoidectomySurgeryHaemorrhoidectomyISRCTN28708390Record Provided by the NHSTCT Register - 2007 Update - Department of Health
尚未招募
4 期
A comparative study on surgery for pile mass in patients low and high grade pile massCTRI/2024/07/071000Aarupadai Veedu Medical CollegePondicherry
已完成
不适用
Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy on Patients Clinical OutcomesIRCT20170610034428N1Ahvaz University of Medical Sciences40