Comparison of open hemorrhoidectomy versus hemorrhoidectomy with electrocautery in patients with hemorrhoid
Phase 1
Completed
- Conditions
- Haemorrhoid.HaemorrhoidsI84, I84.4
- Registration Number
- IRCT2016072028993N2
- Lead Sponsor
- Vice chancellor for research, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
hemorrhoids grade 3 or 4 which is proven by clinical examination; aged between 15 and 50 years; surgical indication; Exclusion criteria: history of previous anal surgery; diseases such as anal fissure or fistula; some degree of incontinency; thrombosed hemorrhoids; history of anticoagulant intake; coagulation disorders; patients with anesthesia prohibiton; addiction; similar disease presents as hemorrhoid pain.
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What molecular mechanisms underlie electrocautery's efficacy in grade 3-4 hemorrhoidectomy compared to open surgery?
How does electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy compare to open techniques in postoperative pain management and recovery time for grade 3-4 hemorrhoids?
Are there specific biomarkers that predict better outcomes with electrocautery versus open hemorrhoidectomy in advanced hemorrhoidal disease?
What are the potential adverse events associated with electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy versus traditional open methods in grade 3-4 cases?
How do combination approaches involving electrocautery and other modalities compare to open hemorrhoidectomy in treating ICD-10 I84.4 hemorrhoids?