跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05296551
NCT05296551终止不适用

Examination of a Novel Cognitive-motor Weight-bearing Dual-task Intervention in Older Adults

George Washington University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 3 人开始时间: 2022年3月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
3
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change in Timed Up and Go Tests in 4 week increments

研究概览

简要总结

This study seeks to understand what factors influence the capacity to perform simultaneous motor and cognitive tasks in older adults to improve movement throughout their community with the least risk of injury. To function in the real world, one needs to "walk and talk", or to move about the community while attending to their environment. Navigating a busy environment becomes increasingly difficult due to the multitude of constraints placed on the organism by both the brain and the body that are associated with aging. Resulting lack of movement causes a downward spiral; further decreasing function and increasing risk of co-morbidities. This will impose an enormous cost on our healthcare system as the elderly population continues to grow in the United States. The investigators aim to investigate both cognitive and movement changes during aging to prevent declines in functional mobility. The investigators will do this through eight weeks training of simultaneous cognitive and motor tasks (cognitive-motor training).

详细描述

In order to functionally move through one's community, it is vital to be able to perform simultaneous motor and cognitive tasks (cognitive-motor dual-task). This allows us to talk to another person, scan the environment for oncoming traffic, and avoid objects that are in our path when walking. This even allows high level sporting participation, such as predicting an opponents' path when sprinting and cutting to score a goal. Unfortunately, aging is associated with increased difficulty in performing cognitive-motor tasks. A classical example is when older adults stop walking in order to talk to another person. Several studies have established that an increase in age is associated with increased cognitive resources required to perform normally automatic motor tasks. Deficits in cognitive-motor dual-task capabilities have been observed not only in older adults, but also in those with neuromuscular compromise due to factors such as stroke and Parkinson's, and even with altered cognition in mild cognitive impairment and Attention Deficit Disorder.

Although these early investigations suggest a relationship between physical and cognitive capabilities, little is known regarding the appropriate level of cognitive task difficulty that will result in improvements or delays in learning a motor task. Conflicting results are noted in the few studies that have investigated this line of research. Some support that a concurrent cognitive task provides a context that facilitates motor learning, while other show that cognitive load prevents individuals from fully learning the motor task . Further, there are very few studies that investigate the effect of cognitive load on the transfer of motor learning to new task conditions for weight-bearing activities. Early evidence suggests that generalizability of learning diminishes the further participants are from the initial task conditions. Interestingly, cognition has been suggested to play a vital role in motor learning, performance, and dual-task capability. Working memory capacity, or the process that allows the maintenance and manipulation of information over a short period of time, has been shown to strongly relate to the rate at which younger adults learn motor sequences, and moderately relate the motor learning of older adults. Executive function, or the properties of cognitive flexibility, problem-solving, and response maintenance, also plays a role in motor learning and performance. Decrements in executive function has been shown to precede mobility limitations, and might even predict gains in mobility from a physical intervention. Executive function may also predict a large portion of the variability when under the context of simultaneously having a cognitive load. There continues to be a lack of understanding of what cognitive capacity is required to perform simultaneous mobility and cognitive tasks with the least risk of injury, and what dose of intervention in both physical and cognitive realms are necessary to induce an improvement in function of both systems.

Purpose: To determine the impact an intervention using simultaneous cognitive and motor tasks on the capacity of healthy adults to improve in functional mobility and cognition.

Research Question: Does a cognitive-motor intervention impact functional mobility and cognition of healthy older adults?

Following obtaining consent from the subject, testing will take place three times a week for 8 weeks. Subjects are randomly assigned to one of each of the three groups: control group, simple cognitive group, or complex cognitive group.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
60 Years 至 95 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Between 60 and 95 Years Old
  • Self-described as generally healthy
  • Normal or corrected to normal vision
  • Able to stand on one foot for at least 3 seconds with minimal sway and no loss of balance

排除标准

  • Known neurologic disorder affecting mobility or cognition
  • Self-reported known moderate or greater lower extremity arthritis
  • Known disease process that affects muscle function
  • Color Blindness
  • Lower extremity pain in the previous 15 days
  • Known learning or attention deficit
  • Currently taking medication that affects attention, learning, and/or memory
  • Known Cardiovascular Disease of previous heart attack or cardiomyopathy
  • Chronic Kidney Disease
  • Severe Obesity as defined by a BMI of greater than or equal to 40 Kg/m2

结局指标

主要结局

Change in Timed Up and Go Tests in 4 week increments

时间窗: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

Timed Up and Go, and Timed Up and Go Cognitive

Change in 10 meter walk test self-selected pace in 4 week increments

时间窗: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

self selected pace walking over an instrumented mat (ZenoMat) both single task and while counting serial 3's

Change in Cognition in 4 week increments

时间窗: Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8

Components of Cognitive Fluidity as measured by the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery

次要结局

  • Change in Muscle Electromyography in 4 week increments(Baseline, Week 4 and Week 8)
  • Balance Test Performance in 4 week increments(Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)
  • change in 10 meter walk test fast pace in 4 week increments(Baseline, Week 4, and Week 8)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Keith Cole

Assistant Professor

George Washington University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验