Articaine efficacy in primary second molar anesthesia
- Conditions
- ocal anaesthesia.Local anaesthetics
- Registration Number
- IRCT2015042321484N2
- Lead Sponsor
- Investigator
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Complete
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 46
5-8 years old subject (Children under 5 years will be excluded from trial because of problem in communication and differentiation between pain and other negative reaction. children older than 8 years will be excluded because of possible physiologic root resorption); Children that consider as cooperative in pre-study visit (According to frankle scale for behaviors classified as Class 3: child is cooperative, but somewhat reluctant/ shy; Class 4: child is completely cooperative and even enjoys the experience); Two mandibular primary second molars that needs pulpotomy treatment; No history of allergic reaction to local anethetics and sulfites; No systemic disease that don not let the dentist treat under local aneshtesia; No pain killer taken for at least 24 hour before treatment.
Exclusion criteria: subjects did not satisfy the inclusion criteria; History of spontaneous or nocturnal pain; gingival abscess or sinus tract; Radiographic sign of PDL widening, reduction in supporting bone density, furcation radiolucency or pathologic root resorption.
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain during pulpotomy treatment. Timepoint: During intervention. Method of measurement: Modified Taddio’s behavioural pain scale.;Child sensation during injection. Timepoint: During intervention. Method of measurement: Wong–Baker FACES pain rating scale.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method -. Timepoint: -. Method of measurement: -.