Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06166316
NCT06166316CompletedNot Applicable

Effect of Implant Position on Clinical Outcomes of Implant-retained Mandibular Overdenture. A 3-year Retrospective Study

Mansoura University1 site in 1 country36 target enrollmentStarted: January 10, 2020Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
36
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
peri-implant plaque

Study Overview

Brief Summary

the study aims to investigate the clinical influence of different implant locations; lateral incisor, canine, and first premolar areas; supporting 2-implant retained mandibular over-dentures with locator attachment on prosthesis retention and peri-implant health.

Detailed Description

the study aims to investigate the clinical influence of different implant locations; lateral incisor, canine, and first premolar areas; supporting 2-implant retained mandibular over-dentures with locator attachment on prosthesis retention and peri-implant health.

  • Thirty-six edentulous patients will be recalled from the database set of the clinic of the removable prosthodontic department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. Patients will be recruited from previous studies, having two-implant mandibular overdentures.
  • All selected patients with the following criteria: mandibular two implants retained overdenture opposing complete edentulous maxillary arch, attended the previous follow-up recalls with previous CBCT examination. Patients who didn't attend previous follow-up recalls, didn't perform radiographic follow-up, or had para-functional habits will be excluded from the study.
  • The patients will be grouped based on the implant position:

Group I (12 patients): patients having mandibular two implants in lateral incisor positions.

Group II (12 patients): patients having mandibular two implants in the canine positions.

Group III (12 patients): patients having mandibular two implants in the premolar positions.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
50 Years to 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •mandibular two implants retained overdenture opposing complete edentulous maxillary arch.
  • •patients who attended the previous follow-up recalls with previous CBCT examination

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients who didn't attend previous follow-up recalls.
  • •patients who didn't perform radiographic follow-up.
  • •patients who had para-functional habits.

Arms & Interventions

lateral incisor group

Active Comparator

patients having mandibular two implants in lateral incisor positions.

Intervention: overdenture retained by locator attachments. (Device)

canine group

Active Comparator

patients having mandibular two implants in the canine positions.

Intervention: overdenture retained by locator attachments. (Device)

premolar group

Active Comparator

patients having mandibular two implants in the premolar positions.

Intervention: overdenture retained by locator attachments. (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

peri-implant plaque

Time Frame: 3 years

modified plaque index

peri-implant probing depth

Time Frame: 3 years

measurements of probing depth in mm

patient satisfaction

Time Frame: 3 years

Assessment of patient satisfaction and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life: using a visual analog scale (VAS) questionnaire

peri-implant bleeding

Time Frame: 3years

bleeding index

overdenture retention

Time Frame: 3 years

Measurements of retention values: using the device of measuring the clinical retentive forces

Secondary Outcomes

  • bone loss(3 years)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials