MedPath

Operative vs. Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Distal Radius Fracture
Radius Distal Fracture
Radius Fracture Distal
Interventions
Procedure: ORIF
Registration Number
NCT03716661
Lead Sponsor
University of Aarhus
Brief Summary

Even though broken wrists are of frequent occurrence, the investigators see a lack of extensive and well executed international studies to clarify which is the best treatment for elderly participants at 65+ years. The Danish Health and Medicines Authority recommend that broken wrists are treated with surgery by using plates and screws when certain radiological criteria are met. Recent studies show that, apparently, there are no advantages by operating rather than treating with plaster when comparing the functional results after one year. However, there is a 30 % risk of serious complications occurring after surgery. This study will examine the pros and cons that participants at 65+ years with broken wrists experience after, by lot, having been treated with either surgery (using plates and screws) or without surgery (using plaster for 5 weeks). The purpose of this study is to compare the complications and level of functioning between participants treated with surgery and without surgery.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  • Danish National Guidelines for operative treatment of distal radius fractures
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients treated with plaster in Arm1/control group who unexpectedly requires surgery
Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
OperativeORIFArm 2 and 3 consist of participants fulfilling the criteria for operative treatment following National Clinical Guidelines. Arm 3: Patients randomized to operative treatment (ORIF)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of participants with treatment-related complications at baselineBaseline
Change in number of participants with treatment-related complications from baseline at 1 year1 Year
Range of motion of the wrist at week 5Week 5

a. Flexion (0-90 degrees) b. Extension (0-75 degrees) c. Pronation (0-90 degrees) d. Supination (0-90 degrees) e. Radial flexion (0-25 degrees) f. Ulnar flexion (0-50 degrees)

Change in number of participants with treatment-related complications from baseline at week 2Week 2
Change in range of motion of the wrist from month 6 at 1 year1 Year

a. Flexion (0-90 degrees) b. Extension (0-75 degrees) c. Pronation (0-90 degrees) d. Supination (0-90 degrees) e. Radial flexion (0-25 degrees) f. Ulnar flexion (0-50 degrees)

Change in number of participants with treatment-related complications from baseline at week 5Week 5
Change in number of participants with treatment-related complications from baseline at month 6Month 6
Change in range of motion of the wrist from week 5 at month 6Month 6

a. Flexion (0-90 degrees) b. Extension (0-75 degrees) c. Pronation (0-90 degrees) d. Supination (0-90 degrees) e. Radial flexion (0-25 degrees) f. Ulnar flexion (0-50 degrees)

Level of functioning at baselineBaseline

Using QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand)

Change in level of functioning from baseline at week 2Week 2

Using QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand)

Change in level of functioning from baseline at week 5Week 5

Using QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand)

Change in level of functioning from baseline at month 6Month 6

Using QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand)

Change in level of functioning from baseline at 1 year1 Year

Using QuickDASH (Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Regionshospitalet Randers

🇩🇰

Randers, Denmark

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath