跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06545786
NCT06545786招募中不适用

Intraoperative Diagnosis of Neurocognitive Complications Via Electroencephalographic (IDEA Network)

Federal Research and Clinical Centre of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 265 人开始时间: 2024年9月25日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
265
试验地点
1
主要终点
Prognostic value of mean intraoperative alpha rhythm power for the development of early postoperative neurocognitive disorders

研究概览

简要总结

Postoperative neurocognitive disorders (PND) are serious and common complications after surgery, especially in elderly patients. These disorders can affect cognitive functions for years, deteriorating quality of life and increasing hospital stays and medical costs. Diagnosing PND is challenging due to their varied manifestations, such as memory and attention problems, and the lack of standardized criteria and biomarkers.

One well-studied form of PND is postoperative delirium (POD). According to the ICD-10, POD is an organic cerebral syndrome characterized by disturbances in consciousness, attention, perception, and other cognitive functions. Researchers suggest that POD development involves a combination of predisposing and precipitating factors.

Electroencephalography (EEG) has been used in anesthesiology to assess anesthesia depth and intraoperative awareness. Modern EEG analysis methods, like spectral analysis, offer new ways to evaluate patients' neurophysiological states. Studies show that EEG monitoring can predict complications such as intraoperative stroke and delirium, particularly in cardiothoracic and neurosurgical operations.

The relationship between EEG patterns and POD is not well understood. Specific EEG patterns may indicate the risk of POD, aiding in the identification of risk factors and prevention methods. This could help anesthesiologists and surgeons optimize their approaches, reducing the risk of cognitive complications.

详细描述

Postoperative Neurocognitive Disorders (PND) are one of the most serious and common complications following surgery, especially in elderly patients. Postoperative neurocognitive disorders can impact cognitive functions for a prolonged period post-surgery, sometimes lasting several years. This not only deteriorates the quality of life but also increases hospitalization time and medical costs.

The difficulty in diagnosing postoperative neurocognitive disorders is that postoperative neurocognitive disorders can manifest in various forms, including memory, attention, and executive function problems. The lack of standardized diagnostic criteria and clear biomarkers complicates early identification and prognosis of postoperative neurocognitive disorders.

One of the most studied forms of postoperative neurocognitive disorders is postoperative delirium (POD). Currently, the concept of postoperative delirium development suggests a combination of predisposing and precipitating factors. Furthermore, according to the ICD-10, postoperative delirium is defined as an etiologically nonspecific organic cerebral syndrome characterized by disturbances in consciousness, attention, perception, thinking, memory, psychomotor behavior, emotions, and the sleep-wake cycle. The indication of an organic nature of the lesion prompts researchers to explore the possibility of diagnosing brain dysfunctions clinically manifesting as postoperative delirium.

Electroencephalography (EEG) has long been used in anesthesiology to assess the depth of anesthesia and the risk of awareness during surgery. With the use of modern analysis algorithms, such as spectral analysis and synchronization between different brain regions, electroencephalography opens new horizons for assessing the patient's neurophysiological state. Currently, the use of electroencephalography for monitoring cerebral perfusion and oxygenation is being studied, which is especially critical during cardiothoracic and neurosurgical operations. One study showed that a new interhemispheric similarity index in electroencephalography could serve as an indicator of the risk of complications such as intraoperative stroke and delirium after cardiac surgery. These data demonstrate the possibility of using electroencephalography monitoring as a tool for predicting adverse neurocognitive outcomes.

The relationship between electroencephalography and postoperative delirium has not been sufficiently studied. The hypothesis is that specific electroencephalography patterns may serve as indicators of the organic substrate development of postoperative delirium, which may lead to the study of risk factors and methods of their prevention. This, in turn, will allow anesthesiologists and surgeons to optimize approaches to anesthesia and surgical intervention, minimizing the risk of negative cognitive consequences.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Scheduled non-cardiac surgery of intermediate or high risk
  • General anesthesia using inhalational anesthetics
  • Informed consent from the patient to participate in the study

排除标准

  • Preoperative MMSE score less than 20 points
  • History of any mental illness
  • Use of psychotropic drugs within 1 month prior to inclusion in the study
  • Presence of neuromuscular diseases
  • Neurosurgical procedures
  • Inability to undergo preoperative testing for any reason

结局指标

主要结局

Prognostic value of mean intraoperative alpha rhythm power for the development of early postoperative neurocognitive disorders

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 3 year

The prognostic value assessment is performed using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). The value ranges from 0.5 to 1.0. The closer the AUROC value is to one, the higher the prognostic capability of the electroencephalography.

Prognostic value of mean intraoperative alpha rhythm power for the development of intraoperative silent brain infarction

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 3 year

The prognostic value assessment is performed using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). The value ranges from 0.5 to 1.0. The closer the AUROC value is to one, the higher the prognostic capability of the electroencephalography.

Prognostic value of mean intraoperative alpha rhythm power for the development of postoperative delirium

时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 3 year

The prognostic value assessment is performed using the area under the ROC curve (AUROC). The value ranges from 0.5 to 1.0. The closer the AUROC value is to one, the higher the prognostic capability of the electroencephalography.

次要结局

  • Prognostic value of maximum intraoperative alpha rhythm power for the development of postoperative delirium(Through study completion, an average of 3 year)
  • Prognostic value of maximum intraoperative alpha rhythm power for the development of silent brain infarction(Through study completion, an average of 3 year)
  • The prognostic capability of the "burst suppression" pattern for predicting the development of silent brain infarction(Through study completion, an average of 3 year)
  • The prognostic value of early postoperative neurocognitive disorders for predicting the development of postoperative delirium.(Through study completion, an average of 3 year)
  • The prognostic value of postoperative delirium for predicting the development of silent brain infarction(Through study completion, an average of 3 year)
  • 28-days mortality(28 days)
  • Prognostic value of maximum intraoperative alpha rhythm power for the development of early postoperative neurocognitive disorders(Through study completion, an average of 3 year)
  • The prognostic capability of the "burst suppression" pattern for predicting the development of postoperative delirium.(Through study completion, an average of 3 year)
  • The prognostic capability of the "burst suppression" pattern for predicting the development of early postoperative neurocognitive disorders.(Through study completion, an average of 3 year)
  • 1-year mortality(1 year)

研究者

发起方
Federal Research and Clinical Centre of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Valery Likhvantsev

MD, PhD

Federal Research and Clinical Centre of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验