MedPath

Edwards SAPIEN-3 Periprosthetic Leakage Evaluation Versus Medtronic CoreValve in Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation

Not Applicable
Terminated
Conditions
Periprosthetic Aortic Valve Regurgitation After TAVI
Interventions
Procedure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
Device: Medtronic CoreValve system
Device: Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis
Registration Number
NCT01982032
Lead Sponsor
UMC Utrecht
Brief Summary

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is a good alternative treatment for patients with severe aortic valve stenosis with similar mid-term success rates as compared to surgery. Periprosthetic aortic regurgitation (PAR) after TAVR remains an important limitation of this technique. Moderate to severe PAR occurs in 15-45% of the cases and it is an independent predictor of mortality after TAVR. Little is known about potential differences in severity of PAR among different types of aortic valve prosthesis. The current randomized study aims to evaluate potential differences between the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis and the Medtronic CoreValve® system with main focus on PAR and additional focus on other clinical and imaging endpoints. Primary objective of this study is to investigate the difference in the severity of PAR, measured with 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3DTEE), between patients undergoing the implantation of the Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis versus patients receiving the Medtronic CoreValve® bioprosthesis. Secondary objectives of this study include: investigating the value of different imaging modalities in evaluating periprosthetic regurgitation after TAVR and studying the difference in clinical endpoints according to VARC-2 definitions and quality of life after TAVR between two available aortic valve prostheses.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
TERMINATED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
56
Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesisTranscatheter aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacement with an Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis
Medtronic CoreValve® systemTranscatheter aortic valve replacementTranscatheter aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic CoreValve system
Medtronic CoreValve® systemMedtronic CoreValve systemTranscatheter aortic valve replacement with the Medtronic CoreValve system
Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesisEdwards SAPIEN bioprosthesisTranscatheter aortic valve replacement with an Edwards SAPIEN bioprosthesis
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
PAR (expressed as regurgitant volume [ml]) after TAVR, as diagnosed with 3DTEEWithin 5 days after TAVR

PAR (expressed as regurgitant volume \[ml\]) after TAVR, as diagnosed with 3DTEE

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
PAR (expressed as regurgitant volume [ml]) 6 months after TAVR, as diagnosed with 3DTEEAt 6 months +/- 2 weeks after TAVR

PAR (expressed as regurgitant volume \[ml\]) 6 months after TAVR, as diagnosed with 3DTEE

PAR (expressed as regurgitant volume [ml]) after TAVR, as diagnosed with cardiac magnetic resonance imagingWithin 5 days after TAVR

PAR (expressed as regurgitant volume \[ml\]) after TAVR, as diagnosed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Clinical endpoints according to the VARC-230 days, 6months, 1 year

Clinical endpoints according to the VARC-2

Quality of life, according to the Euroqol questionnaire (EQ-5D)1 year

Quality of life, presented as scores of the Euroqol questionnaire (EQ-5D)

Quality of life, presented as scores of the short form 36 item health status survey (SF-36)1 year

Quality of life, presented as scores of the short form 36 item health status survey (SF-36)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Medical Center Utrecht

🇳🇱

Utrecht, Netherlands

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath