Effect of HCL Insulin Delivery System on Glycemic Control in Patients With T1D
- Conditions
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
- Interventions
- Device: MiniMed 780G, with hybrid closed loop system SmartGuard, sensor Guardien 4
- Registration Number
- NCT05924932
- Lead Sponsor
- Masaryk Hospital Usti nad Labem
- Brief Summary
The goal of this study is compare the effect of hybrid closed loop system (HCL) for automatic insulin dosing treatment on the glycemic control of type 1 diabetes (T1D) in patient with different initial glycated hemoglobin.
- Detailed Description
Rationale for the Study:
According to our hypothesis, even T1D patients with an initially optimal glucose level should benefit from this treatment method in the form of a reduction in glycemic variability.
There are very few clinical studies from real practice in a larger group of patients.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- patients with T1D
- Type 1 diabetes for > 1 years
- ≥ 18 years old
- CSII (without HCL) or MDI
- Severe noncompliance
- Known severe diabetic retinopathy and/or macular edema,
- Lactation, pregnancy, or intending to become pregnant during the study;
- A condition likely to require MRI. Use of acetaminophen-containing medication;
- Unwillingness to use the study device for >70% of time.
- Conditions that affect red blood cell turnover (hemolytic and other anemias, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency, recent blood transfusion, use of drugs that stimulate erythropoesis, end-stage kidney disease).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group 2 with SmartGuard system MiniMed 780G, with hybrid closed loop system SmartGuard, sensor Guardien 4 MiniMed 780G, with hybrid closed loop system SmartGuard, sensor Guardien 4
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method glycated hemoglobin 12 month The difference and changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c, % DCCT \[mmol/mol\]) between baseline and at 12 months after using HCL.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method time spent in hyperglycemia 12 month percentage of time spent in hyperglycemia (%TAR, \>180 mg/dL \[\>10.0 mmol/L\] and \>250 mg/dL \[\>13.9 mmol/L\])
tim spent in TIR 12 month changes in percentage of time in range (%TIR, 70-180 mg/dL \[3.9-10.0 mmol/L\])
glycemic variability 12 m,onth glycemic variability expressed as the percentage coefficient of variation (%CV) and standard deviation (SD)
time spent in hypoglycemia 12 month percentage of time spent in hypoglycemia (%TBR, \<70 mg/dL \[\<3.9 mmol/L\] and \<54 mg/dL \[\<3.0 mmol/L\])
mean sensor glucose value 12 month mean sensor glucose value
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Lucie Radovnická
🇨🇿Usti Nad Labem, Czechia