MedPath

Effectiveness of Basic Life Support Training for Rural Community Dwelling Elderly

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Community Dwelling
Interventions
Behavioral: BLS training program
Registration Number
NCT05814120
Lead Sponsor
Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
Brief Summary

The goal of this pre-post study is to test the effectiveness of basic life support (BLS) training for rural community-dwelling Elderly. The main question it aims to answer are can the training program tailored for rural elderly improve basic life support knowledge, attitude, and skills? Participants will receive an innovative BLS training program.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
218
Inclusion Criteria

age older than 65-year-old, intact cognition, coordinated activities, and no history of severe cardiovascular disease, asthma, or lower extremity impairment.

Exclusion Criteria

severe visual and hearing impairment, impractical to move, and mental illness.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Experimental armBLS training programGeriatric-specific BLS training program
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes to the BLS Knowledge QuestionnaireCompletion by study, average 60 minutes.

The BLS knowledge assessment consisted of 10 questions with structured "yes" or "no" answers and was based on expert consensus from the AHA (AHA, 2020). Scores were calculated based on the number of correct answers given, with higher scores indicating a greater understanding of BLS.

Changes to the BLS attitude QuestionnaireCompletion by study, average 60 minutes.

The BLS attitude questionnaire contained five statements with five-point Likert-type scale responses ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." Positive attitudinal answers awarded higher scores.

The observable BLS skill checklistCompletion by study, average 60 minutes.

The observable BLS skill checklist included ten steps related to BLS practices, such as assessing responsiveness, calling for help, and using an AED. The researcher completed the checklist and rated each step on a 2-point scale, with higher scores indicating better BLS practices.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Chang Gung University of Science and Technology

🇨🇳

Chiayi City, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath