Effectiveness of Basic Life Support Training for Rural Community Dwelling Elderly
- Conditions
- Community Dwelling
- Interventions
- Behavioral: BLS training program
- Registration Number
- NCT05814120
- Lead Sponsor
- Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
- Brief Summary
The goal of this pre-post study is to test the effectiveness of basic life support (BLS) training for rural community-dwelling Elderly. The main question it aims to answer are can the training program tailored for rural elderly improve basic life support knowledge, attitude, and skills? Participants will receive an innovative BLS training program.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 218
age older than 65-year-old, intact cognition, coordinated activities, and no history of severe cardiovascular disease, asthma, or lower extremity impairment.
severe visual and hearing impairment, impractical to move, and mental illness.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Experimental arm BLS training program Geriatric-specific BLS training program
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Changes to the BLS Knowledge Questionnaire Completion by study, average 60 minutes. The BLS knowledge assessment consisted of 10 questions with structured "yes" or "no" answers and was based on expert consensus from the AHA (AHA, 2020). Scores were calculated based on the number of correct answers given, with higher scores indicating a greater understanding of BLS.
Changes to the BLS attitude Questionnaire Completion by study, average 60 minutes. The BLS attitude questionnaire contained five statements with five-point Likert-type scale responses ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree." Positive attitudinal answers awarded higher scores.
The observable BLS skill checklist Completion by study, average 60 minutes. The observable BLS skill checklist included ten steps related to BLS practices, such as assessing responsiveness, calling for help, and using an AED. The researcher completed the checklist and rated each step on a 2-point scale, with higher scores indicating better BLS practices.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
🇨🇳Chiayi City, Taiwan