Clinical Investigation of New CI Delivery Models in an Adult Nucleus CI Population
- Conditions
- Sensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralCochlear Implant
- Interventions
- Device: Commercially available cochlear implant and AI system
- Registration Number
- NCT03304106
- Lead Sponsor
- Cochlear
- Brief Summary
Use of Artificial Intelligent (AI) technology to assist audiologists in programming cochlear implants.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 102
Newly implanted and existing recipient Groups (Groups 1 and 2):
- Age 12 and older
- Monosyllabic word score administered at 60dBA (2 lists) with an appropriately fit hearing aid in the ear to be implanted who are receiving a cochlear implant as standard of care
- Group 2: 3 months or greater combined experience with commercially available sound processors
- Fluent spoken English skills
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations
- Additional cognitive, medical or social handicaps that would prevent completion of all study requirements as determined by the Investigational team
- Unwillingness or inability of the subject to comply with all investigational requirements
- Use of an acoustic component in the implanted ear
- Less than 18 active electrodes
- Hybrid L Cochlear Implant
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Existing CI recipients Commercially available cochlear implant and AI system Use of AI technology to assist in audiologist's evaluation and programming of existing cochlear implant recipients Newly Implanted CI Recipients Commercially available cochlear implant and AI system Use of AI technology to assist in audiologist's evaluation and programming of new (standard of care-commercial) cochlear implant recipients
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Monosyllabic Word Recognition Scores (CNC) in Quiet Pre-operative/Visit A; Group 1: 6 months; Group 2: 1 month Monosyllabic word recognition was scored in quiet using Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words. Scores are listed as percentage correct thus a higher score (percentage) means a better outcome.Group 1: Preoperative to postoperative percentage performance after 6 months of cochlear implant use. Group 2: Visit A to Visit B after 1 month of cochlear implant use.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (9)
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
๐บ๐ธEnglewood, Colorado, United States
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
๐บ๐ธBaltimore, Maryland, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
๐บ๐ธNashville, Tennessee, United States
Hearts for Hearing
๐บ๐ธOklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
University of Michigan
๐บ๐ธAnn Arbor, Michigan, United States
New York University
๐บ๐ธNew York, New York, United States
Midwest Ear Institute
๐บ๐ธKansas City, Missouri, United States
Cochlear Hearing Center Houston
๐บ๐ธHouston, Texas, United States
Peak ENT Associates
๐บ๐ธProvo, Utah, United States