Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/NCT00364897
NCT00364897
Withdrawn
Not Applicable

Comparison Between Two Tibial Fixation Techniques in ACL Reconstruction

Hadassah Medical Organization0 sites140 target enrollmentAugust 16, 2006
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit
ConditionsPrimary ACL Tears

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Primary ACL Tears
Sponsor
Hadassah Medical Organization
Enrollment
140
Status
Withdrawn
Last Updated
19 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

Tibial fixation is the weak link when using soft tissue grafts and interference screws for fixation in a bony tunnel in ACL reconstruction. The Objective is to study two groups of patients undergoing double loop hamstring autograft ACL reconstruction and compare between the two tibial fixation devices: the tapered Deltascrew and the Intrafix screw and sheath .

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 16, 2006
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
19 years ago
Study Type
Observational
Sex
All

Investigators

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Males and females between ages 21 and 40 years.
  • •Primary ACL tears.
  • •Signed Informed consent.
  • •Availability during follow up period.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Additional meniscal injury requiring suture.
  • •Articular cartilage injury requiring surgical management.
  • •Concomitant ligament injuries to the same knee requiring surgery.
  • •Bilateral ACL injury.
  • •Revision ACL surgery.
  • •Concurrent fractures of the lower limbs caused by the same accident.
  • •Post operative wound infection.
  • •Post operative nerve injury
  • •Cardiovascular compromise.
  • •Professional sports people.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Recruiting
Phase 2
Comparison of two methods of vertebral fixation through pedicle screwing and pedicle screwing with kyphoplasty during recovery and pain and pull out screws in patients with lumbar or dorsal vertebral fracture
IRCT20141209020258N177Arak University of Medical Sciences40
Completed
Not Applicable
Comparison of transpedicular fixation with fusion with transpedicular fixation alone in spondylolisthesis: A Randomized Control TrialSpondylolisthesis.SpondylolisthesisM43.1
IRCT20230907059376N3Afridi Medical Complex, Peshawar28
Completed
Not Applicable
Bone Impaction grafting vs standard fixationtechnique of the acetabular cup in total hip arthroplasty in patients under 60.degenerative hip diseaseosteoarthritis of the hip10023213
NL-OMON36900Isala Klinieken131
Recruiting
Not Applicable
pedicle screw fixation with cement augmentation versus without in the treatment of spinal stenosis following posterior spinal fusion surgery, superiority according to bone mineral density: A three-arm randomized open clinical trial.Condition 1: Patients with spinal canal stenosis are candidates for posterior spinal fusion surgery. Condition 2: Osteoporosis is defined as a mean adjusted T-score of -1.5 or below.Spinal stenosisOsteoporosis without current pathological fractureM48.0
IRCT20190126042496N2eurofunctional Research Center of Shohada Tajrish Hospital92
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of fixing lateral tibial plateau fracturesTibial plateau fracture.Fracture of lateral condyle of tibiaS82.12
IRCT20210614051574N16Esfahan University of Medical Sciences80